Skip to content

HUD Surgical Guidance for Toric Alignment

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Intraoperative Guidance System for Accurate Toric IOL Positioning in Cataract Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07325188
Acronym
CG-Toric
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-08
Start date
2025-11-04
Completion date
2026-10-31
Last updated
2026-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract and IOL Surgery

Keywords

Guidance, Toric IOL

Brief summary

This study aims to assess the accuracy of toric intraocular lens (IOL) alignment axes as calculated and displayed by a novel digital guidance system. In addition, it evaluates the time required to initiate surgical guidance and postoperative refractive astigmatism following toric IOL implantation. This single-surgeon, single-site, prospective, non-invasive observational study evaluated the accuracy of toric IOL alignment axes calculated and displayed by the digital guidance system (Cassini Technologies, B.V.) in 100 eyes. The intraoperatively calculated alignment axes were compared to preoperative measurements to assess their accuracy (in degrees). Postoperative outcomes, including residual refractive astigmatism (diopters) and visual acuity (Snellen), were recorded at 1 month postoperatively.

Interventions

DEVICECassini Guidance

Cassini Guidance with HUD

Sponsors

Gainesville Eye Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation, * Eyes implanted with a toric IOL.

Exclusion criteria

* Ocular comorbidity likely to impair postoperative visual acuities, or * History of ocular trauma or zonular instability, or * Previous refractive surgery, or * Irregular corneal astigmatism or keratoconus, or * Patients with physical or intellectual disabilities that may prevent reliable fixation or comprehension (e.g. Down's Syndrome, Parkinson's Disease), or * Patients with unreliable biometry measurements, or * Severe dry eye disease or ocular surface disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy (measured in degrees of arc) using the Cassini Guidance system for calculated alignment axis for toric IOL implantation.Total completion up to 12 monthsPrimary Endpoint: 1\. Accuracy of the calculated alignment axis (degrees of arc = angular degrees) * Definition: The angular difference between the alignment axis for toric IOLs as determined with the CGS and the intended alignment axis as determined with the Cassini Ambient. * Thresholds of interest: ≤3°, ≤5°, ≤10°, \>10°. * Justification: Misalignment greater than 10° results in a clinically significant loss of toric correction (approximately 33%) (Quesada et al., 2022; Hu, 2023), making this a meaningful accuracy benchmark.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time efficiency (measured in seconds) of the Cassini Guidance System in eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric IOL implantation.Total completion up to 12 monthsSecondary Endpoint: 1\. The time (measured in seconds) required to initiate (0 seconds) and finish (x seconds) surgical guidance using the Cassini Guidance System in 100 eyes undergoing toric IOL implantation.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDr. Clayton Blehm Blehm, MD
claytonblehm@gmail.com(770) 532-4444

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026