Skip to content

Traditional vs. Posterior Nasal Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Rhinitis

Comparison of Traditional Radiofrequency Ablation of Inferior Turbinates With or Without Posterior Nasal Radiofrequency Ablation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07323888
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
2026-03-01
Completion date
2027-05-01
Last updated
2026-05-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Rhinitis, Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy, Nasal Obstruction, Nonallergic Rhinitis, Rhinorrhea

Keywords

Radiofrequency Ablation, Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy, Chronic Rhinitis, Nasal Obstruction, Rhinorrhea, Posterior Nasal Nerve, Randomized Controlled Trial, Single-Center Study

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, single-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical effectiveness of traditional radiofrequency ablation of the anterior inferior turbinate alone versus expanded radiofrequency ablation including the middle and posterior portions of the inferior turbinate (posterior nasal region). Patients with chronic rhinitis who remain symptomatic despite at least six months of medical therapy will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo extended posterior nasal ablation versus traditional anterior treatment. Symptom improvement will be evaluated using rTNSS and other validated questionnaires.

Detailed description

Chronic rhinitis is a common condition characterized by persistent nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea, leading to significant impairment in quality of life. Radiofrequency ablation of the inferior turbinate is an established minimally invasive treatment for patients with symptoms refractory to medical therapy. However, symptom control may be suboptimal in some patients, particularly when posterior nasal neural components contribute to disease persistence. Posterior nasal radiofrequency ablation, which extends treatment to the middle and posterior portions of the inferior turbinate, has been proposed as an adjunctive technique to enhance symptom relief by targeting posterior nasal regions. Evidence comparing traditional anterior inferior turbinate radiofrequency ablation with expanded posterior nasal radiofrequency ablation remains limited. In this prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, eligible patients with chronic rhinitis refractory to at least six months of medical therapy will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either expanded radiofrequency ablation including the middle and posterior portions of the inferior turbinate or traditional anterior inferior turbinate radiofrequency ablation alone. The primary outcome is the response rate based on improvement in reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS), defined as a ≥30% reduction from baseline at 3 months after the procedure. Secondary outcomes include changes in validated symptom and quality-of-life questionnaires and the incidence of procedure-related complications.

Interventions

PROCEDURETraditional Radiofrequency Ablation of Inferior Turbinates With Posterior Nasal Radiofrequency Ablation

Intervention: Radiofrequency Ablation (Olympus Celon Elite ESG-400) * Local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine * RF ablation at 15W * Multiple punctures along anterior, middle, and posterior inferior turbinate (15-20 per side) * Includes posterior nasal region (superior, medial, inferior aspects) * No nasal packing required Post-operative care (3 days): 1. Tranexamic acid 250mg 1cap BID x3 days 2. Amoxicillin 500mg 1 cap BID x3 days 3. Acetaminophen 500mg 1tab BID x3 days 4. Levocetirizine 5mg 1tab QD x3 days + PRN x4 days

PROCEDURETraditional Radiofrequency Ablation of Inferior Turbinates

Intervention: Radiofrequency Ablation (anterior inferior turbinate only) * Same anesthesia and device * RF applied only to anterior inferior turbinate (≈2 punctures per side) * No treatment to middle/posterior inferior turbinate Post-operative care: Same as experimental arm

Sponsors

Chien Yu Huang
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years old * Chronic rhinitis symptoms for at least 6 months that have not responded effectively to medication (should include at least Intranasal corticosteroid (ICS) combined with intermittent use of oral antihistamine and, as needed, combination nasal spray) or where medication has not provided sustained improvement * Total rTNSS ≥ 4 with Moderate to severe rhinorrhea symptoms (24-hour reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score \[rTNSS\] rhinorrhea score of 1-3) and mild to severe nasal congestion symptoms (rTNSS nasal congestion score of 1-3) * All enrolled patients routinely undergo endonasal endoscopic examination, or have had a sinus CT within the past month confirming no significant rhinosinusitis."

Exclusion criteria

* Obstructive anatomical abnormalities limiting access to posterior nasal passages * Nasal anatomical changes due to previous sinus or nasal surgery or injury * Ongoing nasal or sinus infection * History of severe dry eye, chronic epistaxis, rhinitis medicamentosa, or head and neck radiotherapy * Self-reported history of bleeding tendency * Current use of anticoagulants with inability to discontinue * Previous chronic rhinitis surgery * History of poor wound healing after head, neck, or throat surgery * Pregnancy/lactation * Neuromuscular disease preventing supine positioning

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response rate based on improvement in reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)3 months after the procedureResponse is defined as a ≥30% reduction from baseline in the reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS; range 0-12, higher scores indicate worse symptoms).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS)Baseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after the procedureChange in reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS; range 0-12, higher scores indicate worse symptoms) from baseline.
Change in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scoreBaseline, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after the procedureChange in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE; range 0-20, higher scores indicate worse symptoms) from baseline.
Change in Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-RQLQ) scoreBaseline and 3 months after the procedureChange in Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-RQLQ; range 0-6, higher scores indicate worse quality of life) from baseline.
Incidence of intervention-related complicationsFrom the date of the procedure through 12 months after the procedureAll self-reported and clinically observed complications related to the intervention.
Change in Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) scoreBaseline and 3 months after the procedureChange in Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7; range 7-49, higher scores indicate worse symptoms) from baseline.
Change in Patulous Eustachian tube handicap inventory-10 (PHI-10) scoreBaseline and 3 months after the procedureChange in Patulous Eustachian tube handicap inventory-10 (PHI-10; range 0-40, higher scores indicate worse symptoms) from baseline.
Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scoreBaseline and 3 months after the procedureChange in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; range 0-21, higher scores indicate worse sleep quality) from baseline.
Change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) scoreBaseline and 3 months after the procedureChange in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; range 0-24, higher scores indicate greater daytime sleepiness) from baseline.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 14, 2026