Skip to content

Single-Row Versus Double-Row Repair for Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy

Single-Row Versus Double-Row Repair in the Surgical Management of Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial (STRIDE Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07323875
Acronym
STRIDE
Enrollment
166
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2030-03-01
Last updated
2026-06-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy, Achilles Tendinopathy

Keywords

single row repair, double row repair, calcaneal insertion

Brief summary

Achilles insertional tendinopathy may require surgical debridement and tendon reattachment when non-operative treatment fails. Single-row and double-row repairs are used, with biomechanical studies favoring double-row, but clinical evidence of improved outcomes is lacking and costs are higher. This multi-center randomized trial will use the VISA-A score to compare outcomes and inform cost-effective, evidence-based surgical care.

Detailed description

Double-row repairs for Achilles insertional tendinopathy have been shown biomechanically to be stronger than single-row repairs, but clinical studies have not demonstrated clear advantages. Existing comparative studies are limited by retrospective designs and use of non-validated outcome measures such as AOFAS, VAS, and SF-36 Physical Function. No prospective randomized trials have evaluated clinical outcomes of single-row versus double-row repairs. This multi-center randomized controlled trial will use the disease-specific Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score to compare clinical outcomes between single-row and double-row repairs, providing high-quality evidence to guide optimal surgical management.

Interventions

PROCEDURESingle-row repair of the Achilles tendon at its calcaneal insertion

single-row (2 anchors)

PROCEDUREDouble-row repair of the Achilles tendon at its calcaneal insertion

double-row (4 anchors)

Sponsors

Women's College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
The Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University Health Network, Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
Unity Health Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Toronto
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

As noted above, only the surgeon will be aware of allocation assignment. The participant and outcomes assessors will be blinded to minimize bias.

Intervention model description

This study is a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of patients undergoing surgical management for chronic Achilles insertional tendinopathy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must be deemed to have capacity to provide informed consent; 2. Must sign and date the informed consent form; 3. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures; 4. Adult patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years with symptomatic chronic Achilles insertional tendinopathy for a minimum of 3 months 5. Failure of non-operative management (which includes physiotherapy, stretching exercises, heel lifts, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), activity modification, etc.) for at least 3 months. 6. Preoperative imaging (x-ray and Medical Resonance Imaging (MRI)) is available and completed; 7. Willingness of patients to follow the postoperative rehabilitation protocol; 8. Willingness of patients to be available for follow up appointments for up to 2 years.

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy; 2. Achilles tendon rupture; 3. Previous Achilles tendon surgery; 4. Oral steroid use or steroid injection within 3 months of surgery; 5. History of connective tissue or collagen disorder (e.g. Marfan Syndrome) 6. History of chronic inflammatory disorders 7. History of neurological disease (stroke, cerebral palsy) 8. History of using more than 30mg of oxycodone or equivalent per day; 9. Current cigarette smoker (Former smokers must have quit for minimum of one year) 10. Diabetes type I or II 11. Pregnancy 12. Hypersensitivity to metal, Polylactic Acid (PLA), or Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) materials 13. Active infection 14. Worker's compensation claim (e.g. WSIB) 15. History of cognitive or mental health conditions that would make the participant unable to complete study procedures 16. Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease-specific outcomes24 months after surgeryThe Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) questionnaire is a validated, self-reported outcome measure designed to assess the severity of Achilles tendinopathy. It evaluates three key domains: pain, function, and activity level and produces a score from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better function and fewer symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical CostWithin 2 hours of surgeryAssess the cost difference between single-row repair versus double-row repair
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)24 months after surgeryThe FAAM is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire designed to assess physical function in individuals with foot and ankle disorders. Scores are typically expressed as percentages, with higher scores indicating better function.
Visual Analogue Scale Foot and ankle (VAS-FA)24 months after surgeryThe VAS-FA is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess pain, function, and other symptoms related to foot and ankle disorders. It uses a visual analogue scale, typically a 100 mm line, where patients indicate the severity of their symptoms. Higher scores usually indicate better function or less pain.
Plantarflexion strength24 months after surgeryMeasured using a HUMAC Norm Isokinetic Dynamometer Weakness: May indicate calf muscle atrophy, nerve injury, or Achilles tendon dysfunction. Deficits: Can cause altered gait, decreased push-off, and balance problems.
Biomechanical performance24 months after surgeryIncluding ankle kinematics and kinetics during gait and functional tasks, assessed through markerless motion tracking. Gait Analysis: Evaluating walking or running patterns in patients with musculoskeletal or neurological impairments.
Functional endurance24 months after surgeryAs measured by the Heel Rise Test Normal: Able to perform ≥25-30 single-leg heel raises with minimal fatigue. Weakness: Fewer repetitions or lower heel height may suggest calf muscle weakness.
Surgical TimeDuring surgeryAssess the operative time required for single-row repair versus double-row repair.
TENDINopathy Severity Assessment - Achilles (TENDINS-A)24 months after surgeryA validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing pain, symptoms, and functional limitations associated with Achilles tendinopathy. Higher scores indicate greater disability and symptom severity.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTDidem Bozak
didem.bozak@wchospital.ca6473814051
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSi-Hyeong Sam Park, MD, FRCPC

Women's College Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 18, 2026