Skip to content

Neural Mobilization and Capsular Stretching in Adhesive Capsulitis

Effectiveness of Combined Neural Mobilization Techniques and Capsular Stretching Exercises in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07323225
Acronym
RCT
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-04-10
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis

Keywords

Adhesive capsulitis, neural mobilization, capsular stretch

Brief summary

Restriction of glenohumeral (GH) mobility in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC) was known owing to capsular adhesion. There is a little evidence about the involvement of neural restriction in limiting range of motion (ROM) of the GH joint in patients with AC. Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate the combined effect of median nerve mobilization and capsular stretching on improving shoulder external rotation, abduction and internal rotation ROM among patients with AC. Methods Thirty patients will be randomly assigned into two equal groups : Group (A) will receive median nerve mobilization and capsular stretching while Group (B) will receive only capsular stretching (anterior, posterior and anteroinferior capsular stretching). Both groups will receive passive and self-assisted exercises. All patients in both groups will be evaluated pre and post treatment for GH external rotation, abduction and internal rotation ROM.

Interventions

OTHERcapsular stretching plus neural mobilization

anterior, posterior and inferior capsular stretching and neural mobilization

OTHERanterior, inferior and posterior capsular stretching

anterior, inferior and posterior glenohumeral capsular stretching

stretching exercises for anterior GH musculture plus auto passive exercises and pendulum exercises

Sponsors

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

three groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients from both gender (male &female) will be included if they would have second or third stage AC with their age between forty and seventy years * experiencing pain, capsular adhesions, and a reduction of greater than fifty percentage in passive ROM of the GH joint (external rotation, abduction, and internal rotation compared to the sound side * lasting for a minimum of three months. Patients with positive upper limb tension test-1 will be also included in this study

Exclusion criteria

* they would have stroke,Parkinson's diseases that interfere with shoulder muscles activity * diabetes * traumatic shoulder conditions * glenohumeral osteoarthritis confirmed by x-ray * previous surgery, and manipulation of the affected GH joint under general anesthesia * Patients with passive elbow extension ROM

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pain intensity4 Weekspain was assessed by VAS which has two ends. the left end indicates no pain where the right end indicates maximal pain
central sensitization4 weekscentral sensitization will be assessed by the the arabic version of central sensitizatuion questionnaire. To understand CSI scores, the following severity categories have been established: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed Hegazy
mohamed.mostafa@pt.cu.edu.eg00966566169893

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026