Skip to content

Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients

Non Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiac Output and Stroke Volume in Septic Shock Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07321405
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2027-12-10
Last updated
2026-01-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Brief summary

The aim of this research is to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output and stroke volume in patients with septic shock, to evaluate the potential of EC as a non-invasive alternative for hemodynamic monitoring.

Detailed description

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by a dysregulated immune response to infection, leading to organ dysfunction. It remains a leading global cause of morbidity and mortality, often progressing rapidly to septic shock and multi-organ failure if not promptly diagnosed and treated. The complex pathophysiology involves systemic inflammation, endothelial damage, and impaired tissue perfusion, making early recognition and hemodynamic stabilization vital for survival. Accurate monitoring of cardiac function plays a key role in managing septic patients. Cardiac output (CO) and stroke volume (SV) are key hemodynamic parameters guiding therapy in critically ill patients, particularly those with pneumonia and septic shock, who experience severe circulatory and respiratory dysfunction contributing to their high mortality. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors. Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation. Currently, hemodynamic monitoring mainly relies on clinical assessment combined with intermittent TTE, with invasive methods reserved for selective cases; EC holds potential as a simpler, safer alternative warranting further investigation.

Interventions

DEVICEechocardiogram

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the gold standard for non-invasive bedside assessment of CO and SV, providing precise evaluation of cardiac structure and flow. However, TTE requires operator expertise, can be time-consuming, and may be limited by patient-specific factors.

Electrical cardiometry (EC) is an emerging non-invasive bio-impedance technique offering continuous monitoring with easier application and less operator dependency. Despite its advantages, EC's accuracy and reliability in critically ill septic patients require further validation.

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

patients aged more than 18 years must be diagnosed with septic shock following the surviving sepsis campaign \-

Exclusion criteria

* patients aged less than 18 years pregnant women cases suffering cardiac diseases (heart failure, arrhythmia, moderate, and severe valvular disease) patients with poor quality echocardiographic images and measurements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.2026-2028to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring cardiac output in patients with septic shock.
cardiac output and stroke volume in septic shock patientsbaselinecomparison between accuracy and reliability in assessment of cardiac out put and stroke volume using echocardiogram vs electrical cardiometer
to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.2026-2028to compare the accuracy and reliability of electrical cardiometry versus transthoracic echocardiography in measuring stroke volume in patients with septic shock.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactOsman khalaf, bachelor
om62326232@gmail.com01098360564
Backup Contactosman khalaf, resident
01098360564

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026