Skip to content

Efficacy of Bicarbonate on the Risk of Assisted Delivery in Nulliparous Women With Prolonged Labour

Efficacy of Bicarbonate on the Risk of Assisted Delivery in Danish Nulliparous Women With Prolonged Labour: a Double-blinded Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial (The ProLabour Trial)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07321379
Acronym
ProLabour
Enrollment
1520
Registered
2026-01-07
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2028-01-31
Last updated
2026-01-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Labor Dystocia, Prolonged Labor

Keywords

Labor, Bicarbonate, Caesarean section, Assisted birth, Oxytocin, Labor augmentation, Intrapartum

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if oral bicarbonate can treat prolonged labour in nulliparous women with prolonged labour. The main question it aims to answer is: Do oral bicarbonate and restrictive oxytocin use reduce assisted delivery rate (emergency cesarean and vacuum/forceps delivery) in nulliparous women with prolonged labour. Researchers will compare bicarbonate and placebo (a look-alike substance that contains no drug) to see if bicarbonate works to treat prolonged labour. Participants will: * drink bicarbonate or placebo * have cervical dilatation reassessed after 2 hours. If still slow progression, they will follow standard protocol for oxytocin augmentation * will receive a questionnaire 1 month post partum to assess birth experience 1/3 of participants will have amniotic fluid lactate measured at inclusion and after 2 hours

Interventions

DRUGSodium bicarbonate

4,26 gram given once.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo given once.

Sponsors

University of Copenhagen
CollaboratorOTHER
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Aarhus University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Liverpool
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Amsterdam
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The active substance, sodium bicarbonate, will be diluted in a glass of 200 ml soda water added flavour. Placebo consist of 200 ml soda water added the same flavor. Bicarbonate/placebo will be prepared in another room by a person not involved in the specific labour. The person will give the drink directly to the woman. Amniotic fluid will be collected and analysed externally.

Intervention model description

The Danish ProLabour Trial is a double-blinded, parallel group, randomized-controlled, superiority trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years. * Danish or English speaking. * Cephalic presentation. * Gestational age ≥34+0 - \<42+0 (days +weeks) at onset of labour. * Normal foetal heart rate pattern in the 20 minutes prior to inclusion. * Spontaneous onset of labour or non-medical induced labour (balloon catheter and/or artificial rupture of membranes). * Active first stage of labour confirmed, according to Danish national guidelines: Cervical dilatation at ≥4 - \<10 cm with regular painful contractions. * Prolonged labour diagnosed, according to Danish national guidelines: Cervical dilatation progresses at less than 2 cm over a 4-hour period.

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical suspicion of infection (2 confirmed temperatures ≥38.5°C with epidural, ≥38 °C without epidural, or broad-spectrum antibiotics initiated) * Significant medical comorbidity in the form of renal or heart condition, assessed case-by-case basis. * Serious obstetric complication * Known allergy or intolerance to sodium bicarbonate. * Ingestion of sodium bicarbonate in active labour prior to inclusion. * Current treatment with following medicines: Gabpabpentin, Tetracycline, Ketoconazole (NB! These medications are already generally advised contradicted against induring pregnancy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in incidence of assisted deliveryAt birthDefined as a composite of emergency caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in total oxytocin doseIntrapartumAdministered intrapartum for augmentation.
Difference in duration of active labourIntrapartumFrom diagnosis of active labour until childbirth
Difference in birth experienceOne month postpartumPatient reported using Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) which uses a 4-point Likert scale and higher scores indicate a more positive experience.
Difference in amniotic fluid lactate (AFL) concentrationMeasured at inclusion and two hours later.Collected in the labourroom and analysed externally. Attending clinicians will not know the AFL.
Difference in intra- or postpartum infectionIntrapartum and until 7 days postpartum2 confirmed temperatures ≥38.5°C with epidural, ≥38 °C without epidural, or broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Difference in adverse neonatal outcomeFrom birth until 7 days postpartumComposite of perinatal adverse outcomes within the first 7 days of life, including perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity. Neonatal morbidity is defined as arterial umbilical cord pH \<7.10, resuscitation (bag and mask or intubation), hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy II-III, intracranial haemorrhage, neonatal seizures, meconium aspiration syndrome, and admission to a neonatal unit.
Difference in number of women getting antibiotics during labourIntrapartumAs documented in the case records.
Difference in postpartum blood lossFrom birth until 24 hours postpartumVisual assessment estimated by the attending midwife or calculated using a weight if suspected postpartum haemorrhage.
Difference in women receiving tocolytics used during labourIntrapartumRecorded in the case records
Difference in number of 3rd or 4th-degree perineal tearsWithin 2 hours after birthAssess by the midwife/doctor suturing the tear.
Difference in epidural analgesiaIntrapartumAs documented in the case records

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

Primary ContactNanna Maaløe, PI, PhD
nannam@sund.ku.dk+4541271984
Backup ContactNina Olsén Nathan, Co-PI, PhD
nina.olsen.nathan@regionh.dk+4553670600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026