PFLotus With the DePolar Mapping System in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

persistent atrial fibrillation, pulse field ablation, pulmonary vein isolaiton, left atrial posterior wall, mitral isthmus isolaiton, cavotricuspid isthmus isolation, superior vena cava, coronary sinus, epicardial ablation

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), focal, and linear ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) using a novel shape-adaptive pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter (PFLotus, EnChannel Medical) integrated with a novel mapping system (DePolar, EnChannel Medical). The primary study objectives are to determine: * The incidence of serious procedure- or device-related adverse events within 7 days post-procedure (primary safety endpoint). * The clinical effectiveness of the integrated PFA and mapping system. * The ability of the novel PFA system to produce durable ablation lesions. PersAF patients will be treated under general anesthesia using the PFLotus PFA catheter (bipolar, biphasic waveform; 850 V, 60 μs per pulse). Ablation targets, including PVI and other lesions (left atrial posterior wall, mitral isthmus, cavotricuspid isthmus, and superior vena cava), will be accessed under fluoroscopic and DePolar mapping system guidance. Participants will: 1. Receive PVI, focal, and linear ablation using the PFLotus PFA catheter and DePolar mapping system under general anesthesia; 2. Be monitored for serious procedure- or device-related adverse events during the first 7 days post-procedure; 3. Undergo repeat electrophysiological mapping at 3 months to assess lesion durability; 4. Attend scheduled follow-up visits at 7 days, 30 days, and 3, 6, and 12 months post-ablation. Atrial arrhythmia recurrence will be assessed via 12-lead electrocardiography at each visit and by 24-hour or 7-day Holter monitoring at the 6- and 12-month visits.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common persistent cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, affecting an estimated 1.5-2.0% of the general population. As the population ages, the prevalence of AF continues to rise, imposing a substantial and growing burden on healthcare systems. AF significantly impairs quality of life, elevates stroke risk fivefold, triples the incidence of heart failure, and increases overall mortality. Initial AF management typically involves pharmacotherapy for rate control or rhythm control. Compared to antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), catheter ablation offers superior efficacy in reducing AF recurrence, lowering cardiovascular hospitalization rates, and preventing arrhythmia relapse. The cornerstone of catheter ablation is pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which electrically isolates the pulmonary veins from the left atrium. Current guidelines recommend catheter ablation, primarily PVI, for patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal AF, establishing it as a standard therapy for symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) induces cardiomyocyte death via irreversible electroporation using high-voltage, ultra-rapid electric fields. As a non-thermal energy modality, PFA demonstrates selective myocardial tissue affinity. This characteristic may enable durable lesion formation while sparing adjacent critical structures such as the esophagus, blood vessels, pulmonary veins, and phrenic nerve. Notably, PFA has not been associated with thermal energy complications like atrio-esophageal fistula, phrenic nerve palsy, or pulmonary vein stenosis, suggesting the potential for enhanced efficacy with an improved safety profile. Recent evidence indicates that integrating three-dimensional (3D) mapping and navigation systems into PFA procedures can reduce radiation exposure while improving procedural accuracy and clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PVI, focal, and linear ablation in patients with persistent AF (PersAF) using a novel shape-adaptive PFA catheter (PFLotus, EnChannel Medical) integrated with a new mapping system (DePolar, EnChannel Medical). Methods Study Population Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years with documented symptomatic persistent AF (duration 7-365 days) who were refractory or intolerant to at least one Class I or III antiarrhythmic drug. Procedural Workflow All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Activated clotting time was maintained at ≥300 seconds. An electroanatomic map of the left atrium and pulmonary veins was created using the PFLotus catheter and the DePolar system. PVI and additional ablation strategies-including ablation of the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), mitral isthmus (MI), cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and superior vena cava (SVC)-were performed in all patients. For MI ablation, if persistent epicardial connections were identified, adjunctive ablation within the coronary sinus was performed. After a 20-minute waiting period, isolation and block were reassessed. Follow-up Post-ablation antiarrhythmic drug use was determined by the operator and typically discontinued after three months. Oral anticoagulation was maintained per guidelines. Structured follow-up was conducted at 7 days and 3 months post-ablation, with lesion durability assessed via invasive remapping at 3 months. Additional visits were scheduled at 6 and 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 12-lead ECGs at each visit and 24-hour or 7-day Holter monitoring at 3, 6, and 12 months. Endpoints The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of primary adverse events (PAEs) within 7 days post-ablation. Later-occurring events-including device- or procedure-related death, atrio-esophageal fistula, and PV stenosis-were also classified as PAEs. Persistent diaphragmatic paralysis or phrenic nerve palsy at 3 months was considered a PAE. The primary efficacy endpoint was acute procedural success, defined as the proportion of patients achieving: 1) complete electrical isolation of all pulmonary veins, and 2) confirmed bidirectional block at all targeted linear ablation sites (LAPW, MI, CTI, and SVC) in patients undergoing such ablation. Secondary efficacy endpoints included: 1. Acute PV isolation success rate. 2. Acute success rate of bidirectional block for each linear ablation site. 3. Durable success rate of bidirectional block for each linear ablation site at 3-month remapping. 4. One-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence.

No related papers found yet.