Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in ND Int-and H-risk MDS or CMML

Efficacy and Safety of HMAs Combined With Venetoclax Versus HMAs Alone in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Intermediate-/High-Risk MDS and CMML : A Retro-prospective, Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07318662
Enrollment
224
Registered
2026-01-06
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2027-03-30
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

CMML, MDS

Keywords

MDS, CMML, Venetoclax, Hypomethylating agents

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to observe and analyze the clinical efficacy of Venetoclax+HMAs regimen in the treatment of newly diagnosed higher-risk MDS and CMML cases, and to compare the efficacy of venetoclax +HMAs regimen with that of HMAS regimen alone, in order to provide a normative scheme and basis for clinical use.

Interventions

DRUGVenetoclax

Previous phase Ib studies have fully demonstrated that venetoclax combined with HMAs is well tolerated in patients with MDS or CMML. Patients treated with VEN/AZA had a higher chance of SCT after remission and a higher survival benefit

Sponsors

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years old, male or female; 2. MDS or CMML diagnosed by the 2016 or 222 WHO criteria, with a sustained survival of at least 12 weeks; 3. received more than two cycles of Venetoclax plus HMAs or HMAs alone without prior disease specific or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell therapy (before initiating Venetoclax or HMAs, Medications such as hydroxyurea were allowed to reduce the white-cell count to 1.0×109 per liter or less.) ; 4. bone marrow blast cell count (BM blast \> 5%) or IPSS-R score \> 3 (intermediate risk, high risk, very high risk); 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2; 6. complete case information could be obtained.

Exclusion criteria

1. patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria; 2. inability to obtain complete case information or to follow protocol steps or follow up on time; 3. other conditions considered by the investigators to be unsuitable for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall response rateAfter the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2)CR+mCR+PR+HI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
IWG2023 Composite response rateAfter the first cycles treatment(Day1, Month2 )CR+CR-L+CRh+CRequ
overall survivalthrough study completion, an average of 1 yearRefers to the time from the start of treatment to the patient's death or last follow-up.
Blood transfusion dependencethrough study completion, an average of 1 yearChange in proportion of transfusion dependence from the start of treatment
adaverse event rateUp to 1 years after the last subject enrolled.Grade 3-4 adverse events

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026