Skip to content

Adaptive Self-Efficacy-Based AI Coaching for Cycling

Adaptive Self-Efficacy-Based AI Coaching for Enhanced Indoor Cycling Performance: A Personalized Machine Learning Approach

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07318233
Acronym
AI
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-01-05
Start date
2026-05-15
Completion date
2028-12-28
Last updated
2026-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Exercise Adherence Challenges, Exercise Behavior, Exercise Training, Motivational Enhancement, Motivation for Physical Activity

Keywords

Physical Activity, AI affirmations, just-in-time adaptive intervention, cycling

Brief summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether adaptive, AI-delivered personalized self-efficacy-based AI coaching based on real-time physiological and performance feedback enhance indoor cycling power output during a 20-minute time trial compared to static affirmations and exercise-only control conditions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGroup 1: Self-efficacy-based AI coaching

The Thompson Sampling contextual bandit algorithm, trained on Session 1 data, monitors performance continuously and evaluates every 5 seconds whether to deliver an affirmation. The policy is trained to maximize a multi-objective "efficacy-preserving performance" function that rewards: * Maintaining target power relative to rolling 30s/2min/5min baselines * Stabilizing short-horizon power variability (30s coefficient of variation) * Stabilizing heart-rate (HR) trajectory consistent with efficient pacing The decision process considers: * Current power relative to 30-second, 2-minute, and 5-minute rolling averages * Power output variability (coefficient of variation over past 30 seconds) * Heart rate trajectory and cardiac drift patterns * Cadence stability and changes from baseline * Time elapsed and expected fatigue progression based on power-duration curve Self-efficacy-based AI coaching adapts to physiological measures (power and heart rate).

BEHAVIORALGroup 2: Static AI Affirmations

Generic motivational messages delivered at fixed intervals (minutes 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18) regardless of performance state. Messages follow the same complexity gradient based on elapsed time rather than individual response: * Minutes 3, 6: "You're building momentum with every pedal stroke-maintain this strong rhythm" * Minutes 9, 12: "Strong effort-push through this challenge" * Minutes 15, 18: "Final push-finish strong"

Sponsors

University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-40 years * Recreationally active * Familiar with stationary cycling * Able to complete 20 minutes of vigorous cycling

Exclusion criteria

* Cardiovascular, metabolic, or respiratory conditions * Medications affecting heart rate response * Lower extremity injury within past 3 months * Competitive cyclists (\>10 hours cycling/week) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean cycling power output during 20-minute time trialDay 2Average cycling power output over the full 20-minute time trial. The outcome compares mean power between intervention arms (adaptive AI coaching vs. static affirmations vs. exercise-only control). Power is captured continuously via the cycling ergometer and summarized as the mean watts for each participant's trial.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAnna Queiroz, Ph.D.
aqueiroz@miami.edu305-284-3752
CONTACTMeshak Cole, B.S.
mwc94@miami.edu305-284-3752
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnna Queiroz, Ph.D.

University of Miami

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 18, 2026