Skip to content

Enteral Nutrition Versus Standard of Care in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Enteral Nutrition Versus Standard of Care in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07315165
Enrollment
112
Registered
2026-01-02
Start date
2026-07-22
Completion date
2031-05-01
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (Allo-HSCT)

Keywords

Enteral Nutrition, Acute GVHD, Stage 3-4, Stage 2-4 Gut GVHD, Nutritional Support, allo-HSCT

Brief summary

This is a randomized controlled phase II trial which will enroll 112 patients with a diagnosis of a blood cancer or a serious blood disorder who plan to undergo an allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using any conditioning regimen or graft source. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive standard of care (e.g., initiation of supplemental nutrition when oral intake declines) versus enteral nutrition via enteral feeding tube starting on day +1 post-transplant for at least 7 days, usually until engraftment.

Detailed description

This is a randomized controlled phase II trial which will enroll 112 patients with a diagnosis of a blood cancer or a serious blood disorder who plan to undergo an allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant using any conditioning regimen or graft source. Eligible patients will be randomized to receive standard of care (e.g., initiation of supplemental nutrition when oral intake declines) versus enteral nutrition via enteral feeding tube starting on day +1 post-transplant for at least 7 days, usually until engraftment. The primary endpoint will be cumulative incidence of stage 3-4 acute GVHD of the lower gut by day +100 post-transplant, whereas secondary endpoints will be stage 2-4 acute GVHD of the lower gut by day +100, grade 2-4 acute GVHD, weight loss and changes in lean muscle mass, changes in physical function, health-related quality of life, length of transplant hospital stay, and time to platelet and neutrophil engraftment. Assessments will include acute GVHD assessments and grading, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Fried Frailty Index, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTEnteral Nutrition

A commercially available blenderized tube feed nutrition (BTF) formula will be initiated at a fixed starting rate of 25 ml/hr. The infusion rate will be increased in consultation with a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) based on tolerance to reach a feeding goal of 30-35 kcal/kg/day, which includes 1.5-2 g of protein/kg/day.

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All patients in both arms will receive nutrition counseling regarding the use of a high-protein, high-energy diet with snacks and high-protein supplement drinks, as tolerated. Two groups will be randomized, one receiving standard of care and the other receiving eteral nutrition via nasogastric tube. Outcomes will be compared between the two groups. In the study group, enteral nutrition will be administered, starting on allo-HSCT day +1 (the day after the infusion of stem cell transplant). Enteral nutrition will be administered through an enteral nutrition tube; the most commonly used equipment is a nasogastric tube of 8-10 Fr gauge.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of a hematological condition or serious blood disorder * Patient planned for an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant * Any conditioning regimen or graft source

Exclusion criteria

* Uncorrected anatomical deformity of the nose, nasopharynx, esophagus, or stomach that could prevent proper placement of a nasogastric tube. * Chronic gastrointestinal conditions causing malabsorption or need for nutritional supplementation, e.g., celiac disease, short gut syndrome, chronic use of total parental nutrition or enteral nutrition for 3 or more months. Uncorrected anatomical deformity may include any known significant deviated nasal septum, large nasal polyps or other masses, or nasal or oropharyngeal trauma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Stage 3-4 Acute GVHD of Lower Gut100 Days post- transplantCumulative incidence will be calculated as the time to stage 3-4 acute GVHD of the lower gut for each of the study arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Stage 2-4 Acute GVHD of Lower Gut100 Days post- transplantCumulative incidence will be calculated as the time to stage 2-4 acute GVHD of the lower gut for each of the study arms
Percent change in weightDay +30 and Day +100 post-transplantPercent change from baseline weight at day +30 and day +100 post-transplant.
Percent change in lean body massBaseline and Day +30 post-transplantPercent change in total lean body mass measured by DEXA scan at baseline and day +30 post-transplant.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)Baseline and Day +100 post-transplantFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), total score range 0-148, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Transplant hospital stayUp to approximately 30 Days Post TransplantMedian duration of transplant hospital stay compared between groups.
Platelet and neutrophil engraftmentAproximately14 days post-transplantCumulative incidence curves of platelet engraftment and neutrophil engraftment will be generated using the methods of Gray to adjust for the competing risk of death to determine the probabilities of neutrophil and platelet engraftment.
Fried Frailty Index scoreDay +30, and Day +100 post-transplantFried Frailty Index score ranges from 0 to 5, where higher scores indicate greater frailty (worse functional status).
Activities of Daily Living (ADL)Day +30, and Day +100 post-transplantChange in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) score from baseline to Day +30 and Day+100 post-transplant. The ADL scale ranges from 0 to 6, where higher scores indicate greater independence (better functional status).
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)Day +30, and Day +100 post-transplantChange in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score from baseline to Day +30 and Day +100 post - transplant. The IADL score ranges from 0 to 8, where higher scores indicate greater independence (better functional status).
Karnofsky Performance ScaleDay +30, and Day +100 post-transplantKarnofsky Performance Scale ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better functional status.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTKrishna vamsi Gottipati, MS
krgottipati@unmc.edu(402) 5593518
CONTACTIIT Office Clinical Trails Office
IITOFFICE@unmc.edu(402) 5590963
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael Haddadin, MD

University of Nebraska

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026