Skip to content

Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries

Accuracy of Maxillary Fixation Using Custom Plates on Nasal Buttress Only Via Minimally Invasive Approach Versus Custom Plates on Nasal and Zygomatic Buttresses Via Conventional Approach in Orthognathic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07311785
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-31
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthognathic Surgery

Keywords

orthognathic, minimally invasive, nasal buttress, custom plate

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate of the accuracy maxilla fixation using custom plates on nasal buttress only via minimally invasive approach versus using custom plates on nasal and zygomatic buttresses via conventional approach. The main question it aims to answer is: • Is the minimally invasive approach accurate and stable ? Researchers will compare minimally invasive technique to the traditional technique of fixation of the maxilla bone to see if it is as accurate and stable. Participants will: * Undergo surgey * Follow up visits weekly for a month then on a monthly basis for 5 more months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREminimally invasive maxillary fixation

3D printed patient specific custom plates minimally invasive maxillary fixation on nasal buttress

PROCEDUREMaxilla fixation using custom plates on nasal and zygomatic buttresses via conventional vestibular approach.

3d printed custom plates fixing maxilla on nasal and zygomatic buttresses via conventional vestibular approach.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with dentofacial disharmony and misalignment requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgeries. * Patients with no signs or symptoms of active TMDs. * Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who refused to be included in the research. * Patients with systemic diseases that may hinder the normal healing process or render the patient not fitting for general anaesthesia. * Patients with intra-bony lesions or infections that may retard the osteotomy healing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of the maxilla fixation on CT compared to preoperative plan assessed by superimposition of preoperative and immediate postoperative scans.from preoperative plan to immediate postoperative (1 week)linear measurement of discrepancy between both scans after superimposition

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stability of maxilla fixation by superimposing preoperative and 6months postoperative CT scansfrom enrollment to 6 month postoperativelinear measurement of discrepancy between both scans after superimposition

Contacts

Primary ContactMahmoud H Khorshed, MSc
mahmoud.khorshed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg00201002007644

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026