Skip to content

Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm

Comparison of Lithotomy Versus Lateral Position in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Lower Calyceal Stones Less Than 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07310966
Enrollment
70
Registered
2025-12-30
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Calculi

Keywords

lithotomy position, lateral position, lower calyx, FURS, RIRS

Brief summary

Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is an established minimally invasive treatment for renal stones, particularly for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm, offering acceptable stone-free rates with low morbidity. However, stone clearance in the lower calyx remains technically challenging due to unfavorable anatomy, limited scope deflection, and gravity-dependent fragment retention. Patient positioning during RIRS has been suggested as a modifiable factor that may influence endoscopic access, stone relocation, and surgical ergonomics. The lithotomy position is conventionally used during RIRS, while the lateral position has been proposed to facilitate stone migration and improve lower calyceal access through gravitational assistance. Existing studies comparing patient positioning during RIRS are limited, with most evidence derived from retrospective analyses or non-randomized designs. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aims to compare lithotomy versus lateral positioning during RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm in terms of operative and clinical outcomes.

Interventions

Patients undergo RIRS in lithotomy position

Patients undergo RIRS in lateral position

Sponsors

Menoufia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥18 years. * Single or multiple lower calyceal renal stones with stone size \<2 cm confirmed by NCCT. * Negative urine culture. * Presented cases.

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple stones involving renal pelvis or other calyces. * Anatomical anomalies affecting ureteroscope access (horseshoe kidney, malrotation, ureteral strictures). * Pregnancy. * Prior ipsilateral renal surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone Free Rate1 monthStone-free rate (SFR), defined as no clinically significant residual stones on non-contrast 3-mm-cuts CT, measured as yes or no

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative timeThe operative timeoperative time is defined as time between starting the procedure and termination of it measured in minutes
Complications1 monthIntra and postoperative complications, defined as complications happens intraoperative and postoperatively, graded by modified clavien-dindo classification

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactAmmar Alorabi
ammar.alorabi95@gmail.com+201067608011

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026