Skip to content

Mulligan Mobilization vs Shockwave Therapy in Adhesive Capsulitis

Mulligan Mobilization Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Ultrasonographic Changes in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07310810
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-30
Start date
2025-05-01
Completion date
2026-02-01
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis

Keywords

Adhesive capsulitis, Mulligan mobilization, EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE THERAPY, ULTRASONOGRAPHIC CHANGES

Brief summary

To investigate and compare the effects of Mulligan mobilization versus shock wave therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis on Pain intensity level, Range of motion, Functional disability level, Ultrasonographic changes (soft tissue thickness) and Hand grip strength.

Detailed description

sixty patients of both genders according to sample size calculation, referred from orthopedist, diagnosed adhesive capsulitis patients. they screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Their age between 40 and 60 years was randomly allocated to three treatment groups. * Group A (study group) (n=20) will receive mulligan technique and conventional treatment. * Group B (study group) (n=20) will receive extracorporeal shockwave therapy and conventional treatment. * Group C (control group) (n=20) will receive conventional treatment only. Inclusion criteria: patients that will be included in the study will be referred from orthopedic physician with: 1. Patients referred from orthopedist and diagnosed as frozen shoulder 2. The age of the participant will be from 40-60 (Agarwal S., et al.2016). 3. Body mass index from 25- 30 kg/m2. 4. having a painful stiff shoulder for at least 3 months 5. having limited ROM of a shoulder joint (ROM losses of 25% or greater compared with the noninvolved shoulder in at least 2 of the following shoulder motions: glenohumeral flexion, abduction and lateral rotation. 6. ability to complete Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires (DASH). Exclusion criteria: 1. history of surgery on the particular shoulder 2. Rheumatoid arthritis 3. painful stiff shoulder after a severe trauma 4. fracture of the shoulder complex 5. rotator cuff rupture 6. tendon calcification.

Interventions

DEVICEShockwave

From sitting with shoulder abducted at 45 degree and elbow flexed and the forearm rested on flat surface, The patients in the intervention group B received shock wave therapy once a week for 4 weeks. The focus probe sets were used and, in each session, patients received ESWT from anterior and posterior directions (on the average 1200 shocks between 0.1 and 0.3 mJ/mm2) up to the maximum threshold of pain tolerance in the shoulder

OTHERMulligan mobilization

Mobilization with movement (MWM) is the concurrent application of sustained accessory mobilization applied by a therapist and an active physiological movement to end range applied by the patient. Passive end-of-range overpressure, or stretching, is then delivered without pain as a barrier

OTHERConventional treatment

Conventional treatment will be axillary ultrasound and laser ,low loading stretching exercise and home program exercises

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients referred from orthopedist and diagnosed as frozen shoulder The age of the participant will be from 40-60 (Agarwal S., et al.2016). Body mass index from 25- 30 kg/m2. having a painful stiff shoulder for at least 3 months having limited ROM of a shoulder joint (ROM losses of 25% or greater compared with the noninvolved shoulder in at least 2 of the following shoulder motions: glenohumeral flexion, abduction and lateral rotation. ability to complete Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires (DASH).

Exclusion criteria

history of surgery on the particular shoulder Rheumatoid arthritis painful stiff shoulder after a severe trauma fracture of the shoulder complex rotator cuff rupture tendon calcification.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Soft tissue thickness (Capsule thickness)4 weeksmeasured by musculoskeletal ultrasonography
Hand grip strength4 weeksMeasured by hand dynamometer
Pain intensity level.4 weeksmeasured by Visual analog scale
Range of motion.4 weeksmeasured by digital goniometer
Functional disability level.4 weeksDetermined by Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH)

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026