Skip to content

Efficacy and Tolerability of Sucrosomial® Iron vs Ferric Maltol in Iron Deficient Women

A Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized, Interventional Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Sucrosomial® Iron vs Ferric Maltol in Iron Deficient Women

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07308769
Acronym
SID-WOMEN
Enrollment
146
Registered
2025-12-30
Start date
2025-12-11
Completion date
2026-10-01
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA)

Keywords

Iron Deficiency, Iron Deficiency Anemia, Mild to Moderate Anemia, anemia in women

Brief summary

This study aims to compare two oral iron treatments, Sucrosomial® Iron and Ferric Maltol, in women with mild to moderate iron deficiency anemia. Many patients experience gastrointestinal side effects or poor tolerability with traditional iron supplements, which may limit adherence. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either Sucrosomial® Iron or Ferric Maltol for 12 weeks. The primary objective is to determine whether Sucrosomial® Iron is as effective as Ferric Maltol in normalizing hemoglobin levels.

Detailed description

This prospective, randomized, open-label, two-arm study evaluates whether Sucrosomial® Iron is non-inferior to Ferric Maltol in normalizing hemoglobin levels over 12 weeks in women with mild to moderate iron deficiency anemia. A total of 146 participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either Sucrosomial® Iron or Ferric Maltol. The primary endpoint is hemoglobin normalization at Week 12. Secondary endpoints include changes in iron parameters (serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation), fatigue improvement using the FACIT-Fatigue Scale, and assessment of tolerability (adverse events, discontinuations). The study includes a screening phase and follow-up visits at Weeks 4, 6, 8, and 12 for safety monitoring, laboratory assessments, and evaluation of treatment compliance.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSucrosomial® Iron (Sideral® Forte)

Sucrosomial® Iron (Sideral® Forte), 30 mg elemental iron per capsule

DRUGFerric Maltol (Feraccru®)

Ferric Maltol (Feraccru®), 30 mg elemental iron per capsule

Sponsors

Pharmanutra S.p.a.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female participants ≥ 18 years * Mild anemia (11.0 ≤ Hb \< 12 g/dL) or moderate anemia (8.0 \< Hb \< 11 g/dL) * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Use of iron-containing drugs or supplements within 1 month prior to screening * Psychiatric disorders interfering with consent or compliance * Active cancer (except fibroids and polyps) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Participation in another interventional study * History of poor adherence or inability to comply * Use of erythropoietin within 3 months prior to screening * Need for blood transfusion or IV iron (per investigator judgment) * Severe active IBD (HBI \> 16 for Crohn; CAI \> 12 for ulcerative colitis) * Previous bariatric surgery * Alcohol abuse * Hemochromatosis or iron overload syndromes * Hereditary anemias (including thalassemia) * Known hypersensitivity to study product ingredients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin normalization at week 12Week 12 (End of Treatment)Proportion of participants achieving hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL after 12 weeks of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin normalization at intermediate timepoints (Week 6 and Week 8)Week 6 and Week 8Proportion of participants who achieve hemoglobin normalization (Hb ≥ 12 g/dL) at Week 6 and Week 8.
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Day 1 to Week 12Number and proportion of participants experiencing any AEs or SAEs during the study period, assessed at each visit.
Withdrawals due to adverse eventsDay 1 to Week 12Number of participants who withdraw from the study because of an adverse event.
Treatment discontinuation due to intolerable side effectsDay 1 to Week 12Number of participants who discontinue study treatment due to intolerable side effects.
Normalization of iron status markersBaseline to Week 12Proportion of participants achieving normalization of iron parameters: serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT).
Change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue Scale (v4.0)Day 1, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12Change from baseline in fatigue symptoms using the FACIT-Fatigue Scale v4.0. Higher scores indicate improvement.
Change in hemoglobin levels from baseline at each study visitBaseline to Week 12 (with assessments at Week 6 and Week 8)Mean change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline at each study visit.
Hemoglobin variation in participants with chronic inflammation (CRP-based Subgroups)Baseline to Week 12Change in hemoglobin levels from baseline in participants stratified by CRP category. CRP values categorized as follows: Normal (CRP \< 0.3 mg/dl); Normal or minorelevation (0.3 ≤ CRP \< 1.0 mg/dl); Moderate elevation (1.0 ≤ CRP ≤ 10.0 mg/dl); Marked elevation (CRP \> 10.0 mg/dl).
Acceptability / discontinuation due to tasteDay 1 to Week 12Proportion of participants refusing or discontinuing the study treatment due to taste.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTMaria Sole Rossato
ms.rossato@pharmanutra.it+390507846500
CONTACTNataliya Pylypiv
n.pylypiv@pharmanutra.it+390507846598

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026