Loneliness
Conditions
Keywords
Loneliness, Older Adults, Mindfulness, hybrid SMART-MRT
Brief summary
Develop and test an effective machine learning enabled application-based (app-based) mindfulness intervention for reducing loneliness of Hong Kong Chinese older adults.
Detailed description
This study will utilize a hybrid Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial-Micro Randomized Trial (Hybrid SMART-MRT) to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of a single-session intervention (SSI) of mindfulness on reducing loneliness; 2) identify the optimal first-line coaching approach after the SSI of mindfulness; 3) examine whether increasing the intensity of human coaching or adding a telephone-based human-delivered booster session will benefit participants who do not respond to the first-line coaching; 4) determine whether sending push notifications increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of no push notification; 5) determine whether sending a recommended activity increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of no recommended activity; and 6) determine whether sending a personalized motivational message increases the engagement of our app-based coaching, by comparing its results with those of a standard motivational message.
Interventions
Second-line of coaching (4 weeks): Continue with existing intervention plan
Second-line of coaching (4 weeks): Increase intensity of human coaching
Second-line of coaching (4 weeks): Add a booster session
No rerandomization, no mindfulness, No MRT
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
A hybrid factorial-SMART-MRT experimental design with a 2x2+1 factorial design (with five arms) randomized clinical trial, a two-stage SMART, and three MRTs will be utilized.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Aged 65 or older * Possess a smartphone with an Android or iOS operating system * Communicable in Cantonese * Lonely (cut-off \>/=6 on the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale)
Exclusion criteria
* Cognitive impairment, psychiatric disorder, learning disability * Active suicide ideation * Engaged in psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in the past year
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Loneliness | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | UCLA Loneliness Scale; each item will be rated from 1=Never to 4=Always. Total scores range from 20 to 80 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Loneliness | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale; each item will be rated from 1=Yes to 3=No. Total scores range from 0 to 6, with subscale score ranging from 0 to 3. |
| Stress | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Perceived Stress Scale; each item will be rated from 0=Never to 4=Very often. Total scores range from 0 to 56. |
| Sleep Quality | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; each item will be rated from 0=No difficulty to 3=Severe difficulty. Total scores range from 0 to 21. |
| Depression | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Each item will be rated from 0=Not at all to 3=nearly everyday. Total scores range from 0 to 27 |
| Anxiety | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Generalised Anxiety Disorder; each item will be rated from 0=not at all to 3=nearly every day. Total score range from 0 to 21. |
| Physical Health | Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; each item will be rated 0=dependent to 1=independent. Total scores range from 0 to 8. |
| Physical Symptoms | Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Wahler Physical Symptoms Inventory; each item will be rated from 0=almost never agree to 5=agree almost every day. Total score range from 0 to 210. |
| Chronic Illness | Baseline (T0), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | Participants will indicate any presence of chronic illness (e.g., diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure). |
| Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | MSPSS evaluates the social support derived from three key sources: family, friends, and significant others. Each item will be rated from 1=Strongly disagree to 7=Strongly agree. Total scores range from 12 to 84. |
| Lubben Social Network Scale | Baseline (T0), within 1 week after 1st-line of coaching (T1), within 1 week after 2nd-line of coaching (T2), 3 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T3), 6 months after 2nd-line of coaching (T4) | LSNS is used to assess the social networks of participants. Each item will be rated 0=None to 5=9 or more. Total scores range from 0 to 30. |
Countries
Hong Kong
Contacts
The Education University of Hong Kong