Skip to content

Sutureless Glueless Technique Versus Interrupted Suturing for Conjunctival Autograft Fixation After Primary Pterygium Excision: Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) Study

Sutureless Glueless Technique Versus Interrupted Suturing for Conjunctival Autograft Fixation After Primary Pterygium Excision: Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07307820
Acronym
ASOCT
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-29
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Pterygium, ASOCT, Conjunctival Autograft Surgery

Keywords

Primary pterygium, ASOCT, conjunctival autograft surgery

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the clinical and Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) outcomes between sutured and sutureless conjunctival autograft fixation techniques in the management of primary pterygium. A total of 30 patients with bilateral primary pterygia were included. Each patient underwent pterygium excision in both eyes: one eye received graft fixation using interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures, while the fellow eye received sutureless fixation. Allocation of technique between eyes was randomized. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon, and patients were followed up weekly for one month. Parameters assessed included graft thickness, interface reflectivity, gutter size, conjunctival congestion, donor site healing, and postoperative discomfort using a visual analogue scale. The study evaluates which fixation method provides faster healing, better cosmetic results, and fewer complications such as graft slippage or recession, especially in relation to pterygium size.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsutured conjunctival autograft fixation

After pterygium excision, a conjunctival autograft is secured in place using interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures to ensure graft stability and promote healing

PROCEDURESutureless Conjunctival Autograft Fixation

Following pterygium excision, the conjunctival autograft is placed without sutures, relying on natural adhesion and fibrin clot formation to maintain graft position.

Sponsors

Minia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized contralateral-eye design, where each patient contributed both eyes, one receiving sutured and the other sutureless graft fixation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 18 to 65 years (both sexes). Diagnosis of bilateral primary nasal pterygium requiring surgical excision (both eyes affected). Horizontal corneal encroachment of the pterygium ≥ 2.0 mm in each eye. Lesions amenable to conjunctival autograft coverage with expected graft size obtainable from superior bulbar conjunctiva. Willingness and ability to attend scheduled follow-up visits for 1 month postoperatively. Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Recurrent pterygium in either eye. Previous ocular surgery on the study eye(s) (including prior pterygium surgery) or conjunctival grafting. Active ocular surface disease or infection (e.g., conjunctivitis, keratitis) at screening. Severe dry eye disease (e.g., Schirmer's test ≤ 5 mm or TBUT \< 5 s) likely to affect healing. Significant ocular comorbidities affecting wound healing or outcome interpretation: uncontrolled glaucoma with conjunctival filtering surgery, ocular surface cicatrizing disorders (e.g., ocular pemphigoid), severe blepharitis, or severe meibomian gland dysfunction. Systemic conditions that impair wound healing or increase surgical risk (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with HbA1c \> 8.0%, connective tissue disorders, immunosuppression, chronic systemic corticosteroid use). Current use of anticoagulant therapy that cannot be safely paused per local perioperative protocol (if this precludes safe graft fixation). Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Known allergy to any material used in the procedure or postoperative medications. Inability to comply with follow-up schedule or provide informed consent (e.g., cognitive impairment, planning to move away).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported discomfort (VAS 0-10) - SecondaryTime Frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4Mean Visual Analogue Scale (0 = no discomfort to 10 = worst possible) recorded at each visit.
Cosmetic outcome - surgeon-rated score (0-10)Time Frame: 4 weeks (Month 1) postoperativelySurgeon's cosmetic grading based on redness, graft contour and surface smoothness (0 = poor to 10 = excellent).
Graft stability: incidence of slippage or recession (%) - Secondary (Safety/Complication)Time Frame: Within 1 month postoperativelyProportion of eyes with clinically significant graft slippage or marginal recession requiring intervention or observed during follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in central graft thickness (µm) -Baseline (Day 1) to Week 4Absolute and percent change in central graft thickness from Day 1 to Week 4 measured by AS-OCT.
Mean central graft thickness measured by AS-OCT (µm)Time Frame: 4 weeks (Month 1) postoperativelyDescription: Mean central conjunctival autograft thickness measured by anterior-segment OCT at 4 weeks after surgery. Measurement performed using device calipers on the central graft area; reported as mean ± SD per group. This endpoint assesses final early structural integration and resolution of postoperative edema.
Conjunctival congestion score (0-3)Time Frame: Day 1, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4Clinician-graded vascular hyperemia (0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at each visit.
Adverse events (type and severity) - Secondary (Safety)Time Frame: Within 1 month postoperativelyAll adverse events related to the procedure recorded and graded (e.g., infection, granuloma, graft loss), with details on management
Operative time (minutes) - SecondaryTime Frame: At surgery (intraoperative)Duration from incision to completion of graft fixation, recorded in minutes for each eye.
Donor site epithelialization (complete: Y/N and time to healing in days) - SecondaryTime Frame: Assessed weekly up to 4 weeksPresence of complete re-epithelialization of donor site confirmed clinically and by AS-OCT; record time (days) to complete healing.
Gutter size at graft-host junction (µm)Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4Linear measurement of the graft-host interface gap (gutter) by AS-OCT at each follow-up; reported as mean ± SD.
Early recurrence (clinical evidence of fibrovascular regrowth at limbus) -Time Frame: 4 weeks (Month 1) postoperativelyPresence or absence of early fibrovascular regrowth onto cornea at 1 month (noting that longer follow-up is required for definitive recurrence rates).
Interface reflectivity (qualitative grading: low/moderate/high)Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4Qualitative grading of graft-host interface reflectivity on AS-OCT to indicate edema/fibrosis; images assessed by masked grader(s).

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026