Skip to content

vNOTES vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Randomized Trial on Pain and Recovery"

Comparison of vNOTES and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study of Pain, Opioid Use, and Quality of Recovery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07306507
Acronym
VNOTES-TLH
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-12-29
Start date
2026-01-08
Completion date
2026-04-10
Last updated
2026-04-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hysterectomy

Keywords

vNOTES, Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Postoperative Pain, Enhanced Recovery

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing two different minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The aim is to evaluate whether vNOTES provides better postoperative comfort and recovery by reducing pain, lowering opioid analgesic requirements, and improving early recovery outcomes. Approximately 80 women undergoing elective hysterectomy will be randomly assigned to either vNOTES or TLH. All surgeries will be performed under standardized general anesthesia by the same experienced surgical team. Postoperative pain management will follow an identical protocol for all patients. Primary outcomes include postoperative pain scores (at 12 and 24 hours) and total opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes include Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, fatigue scores, time to first mobilization, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. The results of this study may help identify which hysterectomy technique offers better patient-centered recovery and postoperative comfort.

Detailed description

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to compare two minimally invasive hysterectomy techniques: vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). The aim is to determine whether vNOTES offers advantages in postoperative pain control, opioid requirements, and early recovery outcomes by eliminating abdominal wall incisions and reducing pneumoperitoneum-related physiological effects. Eligible ASA I-II female patients aged 18-75 scheduled for elective hysterectomy are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the vNOTES or TLH group using a computer-generated sequence with sealed opaque envelopes for allocation concealment. All procedures are performed by the same experienced surgical and anesthesia team using a standardized general anesthesia protocol. Postoperative analgesia and recovery care are identical for both groups to ensure uniformity of perioperative management. In the vNOTES group, hysterectomy is performed via transvaginal access using a self-retaining vaginal port, with pneumoperitoneum pressure kept at or below 15 mmHg. In the TLH group, a standard laparoscopic approach using a 10 mm umbilical port and two 5 mm accessory trocars is applied, with pneumoperitoneum maintained between 12-15 mmHg. Trendelenburg positioning is used in both techniques but is expected to be less steep and shorter in duration in the vNOTES group. Outcome assessment is conducted by nurses and clinicians blinded to group allocation. Primary endpoints include postoperative pain scores at 12 and 24 hours (measured using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale) and total opioid consumption within the first 24 hours. Secondary endpoints include Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores, Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) scores, time to first mobilization, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications such as nausea/vomiting, shoulder pain, and respiratory discomfort. The study is powered based on a one-tailed hypothesis expecting lower postoperative discomfort in the vNOTES group. The findings of this trial may help clarify whether vNOTES provides superior postoperative comfort and enhanced recovery compared to standard laparoscopic hysterectomy, contributing evidence to guide technique selection in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Interventions

Transluminal endoscopic hysterectomy is performed through a vaginal natural opening via transvaginal access using a self-adhering vaginal port.

PROCEDURETotal Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

It is a conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy performed using an umbilical cord port and two accessory trocars.

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Investigators responsible for postoperative data collection and analysis and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. These investigators were not involved in the surgical or anesthetic management of the patients. Due to the nature of the surgical procedures, blinding of participants and care providers was not feasible.

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either vNOTES hysterectomy or conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Each participant receives only one of the two surgical interventions, and both groups are followed in parallel for outcome assessment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female patients aged 18 to 75 years * ASA physical status I-II * Scheduled for elective laparoscopic hysterectomy (benign indications such as myoma uteri, adenomyosis, endometrial hyperplasia) * Able to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent * Able to complete postoperative questionnaires (QoR-15 and Fatigue Assessment Scale)

Exclusion criteria

* ASA III-IV status * Severe cardiopulmonary disease or contraindication to general anesthesia * Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders * Active pelvic infection * History of extensive pelvic or abdominal surgery complicating minimally invasive access * Cognitive impairment or inability to complete questionnaires * Conversion to laparotomy * Known allergy or intolerance to study medications (paracetamol, tramadol)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain Intensity (NRS)At 12 and 24 hours postoperativelyPostoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Need for Rescue Analgesia Within 24 HoursFirst 24 postoperative hoursThe proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (intravenous tramadol 100 mg) after the standard regimen (paracetamol intravenously every 8 hours) will be recorded along with the number of rescue doses per patient.
Time to First MobilizationFrom the end of surgery until the first ambulation out of bed, assessed up to 48 hours postoperatively.Time from the end of surgery to the first ambulation out of bed will be recorded in hours.
Time to First FlatusTime Frame: From the end of surgery until the first passage of flatus, assessed during the postoperative hospital stay, up to 7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge, whichever comes first.Time from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus will be recorded in hours as an indicator of return of bowel function.
Length of Postoperative Hospital StayTime Frame: From the day of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days postoperatively or until discharge, whichever comes first.Length of stay will be calculated as the number of days from the day of surgery to the day of hospital discharge.
Change in QoR-15 Score from Baseline to 24 HoursTime Frame: Preoperative (within 24 hours before surgery) and 24 hours postoperativelyThe Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire (total score 0-150; higher scores indicate better recovery) will be administered preoperatively and at 24 hours postoperatively. The primary analysis will focus on the change in total score from baseline to 24 hours.
Change in Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) Score from Baseline to 24 HoursPreoperative (within 24 hours before surgery) and 24 hours postoperativelyFatigue will be evaluated using the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS; total score 10-50, higher scores indicate greater fatigue). The change in total score from baseline to 24 hours will be analyzed.
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)During the first 24 hours postoperativelyPostoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded. Nausea severity will be assessed using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 indicates no nausea and 10 indicates the worst imaginable nausea. Rescue antiemetic therapy will be administered if nausea severity is ≥4 or if vomiting occurs, and the need for rescue antiemetic treatment will be documented.
Postoperative Hemoglobin DecreaseFrom preoperative baseline to 24 hours postoperativelyHemoglobin decrease will be calculated as the difference between preoperative hemoglobin level and postoperative hemoglobin level measured at 24 hours after surgery.
Postoperative Delirium and Acute Cognitive DysfunctionWithin the first 24 hours postoperativelyPostoperative delirium and acute cognitive dysfunction will be assessed using the 4AT (4 'A's Test) screening tool within the first 24 hours after surgery. The 4AT evaluates four domains: 1. Alertness (level of arousal), 2. AMT4 (abbreviated mental test: age, date of birth, place, and current year), 3. Attention (months of the year backwards), 4. Acute change or fluctuating course. Scores range from 0 to 12, with 0 indicating normal cognition, 1-3 suggesting possible cognitive impairment, and ≥4 indicating probable delirium. The incidence of postoperative delirium (4AT ≥4) and acute cognitive dysfunction (4AT ≥1) will be recorded and compared between the vNOTES and TLH groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFatma Acil, M.D.

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 4, 2026