Skip to content

One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching

One-Minute Preceptor to Improve Bedside Teaching: a Cluster Randomized Trial in Residents

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07305077
Enrollment
450
Registered
2025-12-26
Start date
2025-08-20
Completion date
2026-04-10
Last updated
2025-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bedside Teaching, Clinical Teaching, Medical Education

Brief summary

Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Model Description: Cluster-randomized by preceptor (30 clusters; 15 OMP/15 control). Outcomes at student level; 15 students per cluster. Adequate OMP exposure is defined a priori as ≥2 structured OMP feedback encounters (≥5 minutes each) delivered across ≥2 separate weeks of the rotation. Masking: Outcomes Assessor

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOne-Minute Preceptor (OMP)

Faculty development workshop (90 min), pocket card, coaching, audit with OMP 5-step fidelity checklist.

Sponsors

Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Cluster-randomized by preceptor (n=30 clusters; 15 OMP vs 15 control); outcomes at student level

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A. Student participants (outcome level): Aged ≥18 years at enrollment. Enrolled Year 4-medical students assigned to one of the participating preceptor-led bedside teaching groups during the study period. Expected to attend the rotation for 8-12 weeks (or the site's standard rotation length). Able to provide informed consent (and agree to be observed/assessed via mini-CEX). \- B. Preceptor clusters (randomized units): Resident physicians serving as bedside teaching preceptors in participating departments. Will supervise approximately 15 students during the study period. Agree not to cross over to teach students in the opposite trial arm during the trial period. Able to attend OMP training and permit fidelity observation (checklist) if allocated to the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

* A. Student participants: Prior exposure to formal OMP-based teaching within the past 6 months in the same department. Not expected to remain on the rotation long enough to be assessed (e.g., planned absence \>2 weeks or early withdrawal). Declines or withdraws informed consent. Severe communication barrier that precludes valid assessment (e.g., language barrier without support). \- B. Preceptor clusters: Formal OMP training within the past 12 months (to avoid contamination), or role as an OMP trainer for other faculty during the study period. Planned cross-coverage that would result in teaching students from both arms during the trial period. Anticipated extended leave making fidelity and outcome assessments infeasible.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) Total Score8 - 12 weeksTotal score on the mini-CEX, ranging from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better bedside teaching performance as rated by student participants. Measure Type: Continuous.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Satisfaction Score8-12 weeksDescription: Student satisfaction with bedside teaching will be measured using a Likert-scale questionnaire specifically developed for this study. The total score ranges from 1 to 5, where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the teaching encounter. Measure Type: Continuous. Unit of Measure: Score (1-5)

Countries

Vietnam

Contacts

Backup ContactNgo
ncquang@ctump.edu.vn
Primary ContactQuang Chi Ngo, Master Degree
ncquang@ctump.edu.vn+84789565090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 13, 2026