Skip to content

Neuromodulation Strategies for Treatment-Resistant Essential Tremor Using Chronos™ DBS

Neuromodulation in Treatment Resistant Essential Tremor in Early Habituation - Investigating Low and High Frequencies / Waveform Shaping / Pulse and Bursts / Combination Therapy in Deep Brain Stimulation Utilizing the Boston Scientific® Chronos™ Software

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07302867
Enrollment
5
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2026-04-01
Completion date
2028-04-01
Last updated
2025-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Tremor

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation, Essential Tremor

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether a new way of programming Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) can improve and maintain tremor control in adults with essential tremor (ET) who stopped responding to standard DBS therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are: * 1\. Can advanced DBS settings, using varied stimulation patterns, frequencies, and pulses, restore tremor control in people with ET who lost benefit from standard Ventral Intermedius Deep Brain Stimulation (VIM-DBS)? * 2\. Do these advanced settings provide more stable, longer-lasting tremor improvement over time? Researchers will compare six different stimulation settings to see if any of them can improve tremor symptoms when standard DBS programming no longer works. Participants will: * Complete a clinic visit where they try six different DBS stimulation settings using specialized Chronos software. * Be randomly assigned to one of these settings to use at home. * Receive a follow-up phone call at 4 weeks to check on symptoms and device use. * Return to the clinic at 3 months for a full tremor evaluation. * Have the option to return for an additional follow-up visit at 1 year. This study will include 5 participants with essential tremor who previously lost benefit quickly after receiving standard VIM-DBS treatment.

Detailed description

* Purpose: To test whether new DBS programming patterns can restore and sustain tremor control in essential tremor (ET) patients who lose benefit quickly after standard Vim-DBS. * Hypothesis: Novel stimulation paradigms - like high-frequency, microburst, cycling, and scheduling - can overcome early habituation and provide lasting tremor improvement. * Justification: Some ET patients experience rapid loss of benefit despite correct DBS placement. Standard programming does not help them, creating a disabling condition. Advanced programming may offer a safe, non-surgical solution. * Objectives: * 1\. Determine if Chronos™ software programs maintain tremor improvement beyond one month. * 2\. Assess safety, tolerability, and identify the most effective stimulation parameters. * Research Design: Prospective, single-center cohort study of 5 early-habituating ET patients. Patients trial six stimulation paradigms in clinic, then are randomized to one program for home use. Follow-up occurs at 4 weeks, 3 months, and optionally 1 year. * Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics due to small sample size. Outcomes include tremor ratings, patient-reported benefit, and recurrence of habituation.

Interventions

DBS setting: 185 Hz, 60 µs pulse width, optimized amplitude

OTHERContinuous + High Frequency Cycling

DBS setting: Alternates 30s at 185 Hz and 30s at 1000 Hz

DBS setting: 1000 Hz continuous, 60 µs, optimized amplitude

OTHERMicroburst

DBS setting: 900 Hz intraburst, 80 Hz interburst, 6 pulses per packet

DBS setting: Two or three effective programs on alternating schedules

OTHERCycling

DBS setting: 30s on / 5s off cycle without ramp, subthreshold stimulation

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, single-center, single-group assignment interventional study. All enrolled participants undergo a structured trial of six experimental DBS stimulation paradigms delivered through Chronos™ software. Participants are then randomized to one stimulation program for at-home use. There is no comparison group; all participants receive active intervention. Follow-up occurs at 4 weeks, 3 months, and optionally at 1 year to assess tremor response, durability of benefit, and safety.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults with essential tremor who have undergone standard Vim-DBS surgery * Demonstrated rapid (early) habituation to standard programming. * Ability to provide informed consent and attend follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to attend programming visits. * Cognitive or language impairment precluding consent. * Other neurological conditions confounding tremor assessment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Fahn-Tolosa-Marín Tremor Rating Scale (FTM-TRS)3-Month post programming

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactDanielle A Pietramala
danielle.pietram@ubc.ca604-875-4111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026