Skip to content

The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System

The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System on Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude and Brief Resilience Among University Students

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07302529
Enrollment
140
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2025-10-31
Completion date
2026-02-10
Last updated
2026-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Integrated Disaster Management System, University Students, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, Perception

Keywords

Integrated Disaster Management System, Disaster Risk Perception, Disaster Attitude, Psychological Resilience, University Students, Nursing

Brief summary

Integrated disaster management is defined as a management process that considers all hazards to create a resilient and resilient society capable of coping with disasters, and utilizes all the resources and resources of society to implement the necessary actions and measures in the prevention, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery phases of disaster management. Educational interventions for disaster management are the most important initiatives in both risk reduction and crisis management. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a hybrid intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system on disaster risk perception, disaster attitudes, and psychological resilience in university students. The students participating in this study will be administered a mixed intervention structured according to the integrated disaster management system (15-week disaster culture course presentation, case studies, simulation, expert conferences, and material development). Because randomization is not possible, the study adopts a quasi-experimental design. However, measures will be taken to reduce the risk of bias by creating a control group, increasing the number of measurements, using a different scale for test measurements, and ensuring that the individuals implementing the interventions, performing data analysis, and performing the measurements are different. The disaster risk perception scale, disaster attitude scale, and brief psychological resilience scale will be used to collect data. Data analysis will be evaluated at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p\<0.05.

Interventions

This study is distinguished by the fact that the intervention was conducted on university students, the intervention was structured according to the integrated disaster management system, case studies and simulation were included in the training content, conferences by field professionals in disaster management were included in the initiative, and the study team consisted of doctoral-level researchers.

Sponsors

Necmettin Erbakan University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Masking will be ensured in the study in terms of data/output measurement, statistical analysis and reporting. A psychological resilience scale was added as a measurement tool to mask the effect of the instrument.

Intervention model description

A 15-week mixed intervention will be implemented in the experimental group. The intervention will include lectures on disaster culture, conferences by Red Crescent staff and AKUT volunteers, case studies structured according to the integrated disaster management system, a disaster simulation application, and student material development.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Registered as a student at the university where the research will be conducted * Active participation in the disaster culture course

Exclusion criteria

* There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disaster risk perceptionFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeksChanges disaster risk perception scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students
disaster attitudeFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeksChanges disaster attitude scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
psychological resilienceFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 15 weeksChanges psychological resilience scores after a structured mixed intervention based on an integrated disaster management system implemented on university students

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026