Skip to content

Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Web-based Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Application in Solid Cancer Patients

Randomized Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy of Web-based Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Application in Solid Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07301996
Acronym
Mobile PRO
Enrollment
166
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2021-02-04
Completion date
2021-07-21
Last updated
2025-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Cancer

Keywords

Patient reported outcome

Brief summary

This is a single-center, open-label, Phase 2 study to evaluate the feasibility of a mobile PRO and its efficacy in reducing unplanned healthcare utilization (unplanned outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations).

Detailed description

The intervention lasted 12 weeks. Patients in the Mobile PRO group received instruction on symptom reporting and were asked to submit reports at baseline and at least once before each outpatient visit. Treating oncologist reviewed Mobile PRO entries during clinic visits and used the information in clinical decision-making; no automated alerts or additional staff-based interventions were implemented. Usual-care patients did not use Mobile PRO; symptoms were assessed verbally during routine outpatient visits. AEs in both groups were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. All patients received chemotherapy according to institutional practice, including guideline-based antiemetic prophylaxis. Survival follow-up was conducted every 3 months after the 12-week intervention.

Interventions

DEVICEMobile PRO

Patients in the Mobile PRO group received instruction on symptom reporting and were asked to submit reports at baseline and at least once before each outpatient visit. Treating oncologist reviewed Mobile PRO entries during clinic visits and used the information in clinical decision-making; no automated alerts or additional staff-based interventions were implemented.

OTHERusual care

Usual-care patients did not use Mobile PRO; symptoms were assessed verbally during routine outpatient visits. AEs in both groups were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. All patients received chemotherapy according to institutional practice, including guideline-based antiemetic prophylaxis.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The intervention lasted 12 weeks. Patients in the Mobile PRO group received instruction on symptom reporting and were asked to submit reports at baseline and at least once before each outpatient visit. Treating oncologist reviewed Mobile PRO entries during clinic visits and used the information in clinical decision-making; no automated alerts or additional staff-based interventions were implemented. Usual-care patients did not use Mobile PRO; symptoms were assessed verbally during routine outpatient visits. AEs in both groups were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 5.0. All patients received chemotherapy according to institutional practice, including guideline-based antiemetic prophylaxis. Survival follow-up was conducted every 3 months after the 12-week intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥19 years old * Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid cancer (clinical diagnosis accepted for hepatocellular carcinoma per the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines) * Receiving systemic therapy (cytotoxic, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or combinations) as monotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy * Able to use a smartphone or tablet independently or with caregiver assistance.

Exclusion criteria

* Receiving third-line or later palliative systemic therapy * Inability to understand PROM content.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of unplanned healthcare utilization per patient12-week intervention periodthe composite of unplanned outpatient visits, emergency departments, visits, or hospitalizations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact on health-related QoL (HRQoL)12-week intervention periodHRQoL was measured using the Korean version of EQ-5D-5L at baseline and 12 weeks, with index values derived from the Korean valuation set. For secondary analyses, EQ-5D-5L dimensions were dichotomized as no problems (Level 1) versus any problems (Levels 2-5).
Progression-free survivalFrom the date of starting chemotherapy to the date of first documentation of progression or death (up to approximately 1 years)The time from the date of starting chemotherapy to the date of disease progression as per RECIST version 1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Overall survivalFrom the date of starting chemotherapy to the date of death (up to approximately 1 years)The time from the date of starting chemotherapy to the date of death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
The proportions of individual components of unplanned healthcare use12-week intervention periodUnplanned healthcare use was defined by its components: outpatient visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions. This outcome specifically measured the proportions of these three components.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of supportive medication prescriptions12-week intervention periodThe rate of supportive medication prescriptions, including anti-emetics, anti-diarrheal agents, digestives, analgesics, pegylated G-CSF, anti-histamine, corticosteroids, constipation medications, and other medication.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026