Skip to content

Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite.

Evaluation of the Effects of the Leaf Expander Versus Hyrax Expander in Mixed Dentition Patients With Posterior Crossbite: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07301918
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2027-03-01
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Maxilla; Hypoplasia, Posterior Crossbite

Keywords

expander, maxillary transverse deficiency, posterior crossbite, mixed dentition

Brief summary

Design: Two-arm parallel randomized clinical trial in mixed dentition (6-12 years). Arms: (1) 9 mm, 900 g leaf expander; (2) 9 mm Hyrax expander. Follow-up: From appliance insertion → completion of intended expansion → 6-month retention. Primary outcome: Pain perception during the first 7 days post-insertion (daily patient-reported scale). Secondary outcomes: Skeletal and dental changes on CBCT.

Detailed description

Participants receive a banded maxillary expansion appliance cemented to maxillary first permanent molars, assigned to: Leaf expander arm: Nickel-titanium leaf-spring expander, 9 mm screw, delivering force of \ 900 g. Hyrax expander arm: Conventional tooth-borne jackscrew expander, 9 mm screw. Standard activation: two turns per week. Retention: Both appliances kept passively in situ for 6 months of retention following achievement of planned expansion.

Interventions

The Leaf expander incorporates Nickel Titanium springs that will not require the patients' home activation

Hyrax expander incorporates a screw that requires the patients' home activation

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

statistician

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients * Mixed dentition stage * Unilateral or bilateral posterior crossbite. * Patients in prepubertal stage with cervical vertebral maturation stage 1-3. * Fully erupted maxillary and mandibular permanent first molars. * Skeletal class I or II.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous orthodontic treatment. * Missing teeth. * Inadequate oral hygiene. * Patients with bad oral habits. * Patients with medical conditions. * Patients with cleft lip and palate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain perceptionfirst week after appliance insertionPain perception during the first week after insertion using Wong-Becker faces scale with minimum value of zero and maximum value of ten, ten score represents the worst pain percieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
skeletal expansion6 months post expansionskeletal expansion using Cone Beam Computed Tomography skeletal expansion: linear distances of the midpalatal suture opening measured in mm between the pre- and post-axial cuts of the CBCT
dental tipping6 months post-expansionAngular measurement of upper first molars angulation measured in degrees between pre- and post-coronal cuts of the CBCT
digital models parameterssix months post-expansionIntermolar width, intercanine width

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026