Skip to content

Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics

Comparison Of Hemodynamic Stress Response To Laryngoscopy With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Macintosh Laryngoscopy In Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07300878
Enrollment
208
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2025-12-22
Completion date
2026-05-15
Last updated
2026-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Conventional Laryngoscopy, Laryngoscopic Stress Response, Video Laryngoscopy

Keywords

Laryngoscopic stress response, Video laryngoscopy, Conventional laryngoscopy

Brief summary

In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe. This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia. For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate. This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.

Detailed description

In this study Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with group V patients being intubated using Videolaryngoscope while group M patients will be intubated using Macintosh laryngoscope. The amount of rise in blood pressure and heart rate as a result of laryngoscopy will be noted.

Interventions

DEVICEC MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy

Patient will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope

DEVICEConventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopy

Sponsors

Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgeries under General Endotracheal Anesthesia. ASA class I and II.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Body mass index \>35 kg/m2 * No teeth * Maxillofacial trauma * Limited Cervical spine movement * Upper Airway Tumors * Preoperative assessment indicating difficult airway requiring use of video laryngoscope or fiberoptic intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Heart RateUpon arrival in OR (baseline) then immediately following intubation (T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Mean Blood PressureThis will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
Systolic Blood PressureThis will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
Diastolic Blood PressureThis will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 30, 2026