Skip to content

Effect of PRP Injection on Voice Recovery After Benign Vocal Fold Surgery

Evaluating The Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma on Voice Outcomes Following Surgical Removal of Benign Vocal Fold Lesions

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07300800
Enrollment
64
Registered
2025-12-24
Start date
2025-03-04
Completion date
2026-07-30
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Vocal Fold Lesions

Keywords

vocal fold polyp, vocal fold nodules, vocal fold cyst

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections can improve voice outcomes after microlaryngosurgery in patients with benign vocal fold lesions. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does postoperative PRP injection improve vocal quality compared to conventional surgery alone? Does PRP injection reduce vocal fatigue and improve patients' voice-related quality of life? Researchers will compare 32 patients receiving PRP injections after surgical removal of lesions (intraoperative injection) to 32 patients undergoing conventional surgery without PRP to see if PRP enhances recovery and voice function. Participants will: Undergo microlaryngosurgery to remove benign vocal fold lesions. Receive a PRP injection to the operated vocal fold and standard postoperative care. Or Standard postoperative care only. Complete voice assessments before surgery and at 1 and 3 months after surgery, including: Auditory perceptual evaluation (GRBAS scale) Videostroboscopy Acoustic and aerodynamic voice analysis Vocal Fatigue Index (VFI) All participants will provide written consent and undergo standard preoperative assessments including medical history, ENT examination, laboratory tests, ECG, and anesthesia evaluation.

Detailed description

Benign vocal fold lesions are commonly treated with microlaryngosurgery when conservative management fails; however, postoperative voice recovery may be variable, and some patients experience persistent dysphonia or vocal fatigue. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as a biologic adjunct that may enhance tissue healing through its regenerative and anti-inflammatory properties. This clinical trial evaluates the effect of postoperative PRP injection as an adjunct to microlaryngosurgery for benign vocal fold lesions. The study compares voice recovery in patients receiving PRP injection during surgery with those receiving conventional postoperative management alone. Adult patients undergoing microlaryngosurgery for benign vocal fold lesions will be enrolled and allocated to one of two study groups: a PRP injection group or a conventional treatment group. All participants will undergo standard surgical management, with the intervention group receiving an additional PRP injection to the operated vocal fold. Voice outcomes will be assessed longitudinally at predefined postoperative intervals using objective, perceptual, and patient-reported measures. These assessments are intended to evaluate postoperative voice quality, vocal function, and patient-perceived vocal fatigue. All participants will undergo routine preoperative evaluation and provide written informed consent in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines. This study aims to determine whether PRP injection provides additional benefit in voice recovery following microlaryngosurgery for benign vocal fold lesions.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPlatelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection after Microlaryngoscopic Surgery for PRP Group

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection Patients in this group will undergo microlaryngoscopic removal of benign vocal fold lesions under general anesthesia. Following surgery, autologous PRP will be injected into the superficial lamina propria (Reinke's space), just lateral to the excision site, using a Chiba needle. The injection aims to promote tissue regeneration, improve postoperative healing, and enhance vocal quality. Care is taken to avoid the free edge of the vocal fold to minimize scarring or stiffness. The PRP is prepared fresh from the patient's blood on the day of injection.

PROCEDUREConventional Microlaryngoscopic Surgery (Active Comparator)

Patients in this group will undergo microlaryngoscopic removal of benign vocal fold lesions under general anesthesia without PRP injection. Standard postoperative care is provided. This group serves as a comparator to evaluate the additional effect of PRP on voice recovery.

Sponsors

Beni-Suef University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors and voice analysts were masked to treatment allocation to avoid assessment bias when evaluating voice outcomes (GRBAS, acoustic analysis). Patient-reported VFI forms were collected using standardized procedures.

Intervention model description

The surgery will be performed under general anesthesia. All patients will undergo microlaryngoscopic removal of the vocal fold lesions under microscopic or endoscopic guidance using a rigid laryngoscope, and hemostasis will be achieved. For patients in the PRP group, 0.25-1.5 mL of PRP will be injected into the superficial lamina propria (Reinke's space), just lateral to the excision site, using a Chiba needle. This site is chosen to promote tissue regeneration without damaging the vocal ligament or muscle, while slightly medializing the vocal fold for better glottic closure. Care will be taken to avoid the free edge of the vocal fold, as direct injection there can cause scarring, stiffness, or worsening of voice quality. The injection volume will typically range from 0.25 to 1.5 mL depending on the size of the lesion and the vocal fold.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion Criteria: \* Adults aged 18 to 50 years \* Diagnosis of a benign vocal fold lesion, including: Vocal fold polyps Vocal fold cysts Vocal fold nodules \* Failure to respond to conservative management, including one or more of the following: Voice rest, voice therapy *

Exclusion criteria

* Age younger than 18 years or above 50 * Medically unfit for surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shimmer (Local, dB)From enrollment, including baseline voice assessment, through surgery and postoperative follow-up assessments at 1 month and 3 monthsShimmer (local), expressed in decibels (dB), representing cycle-to-cycle amplitude variation, will be obtained from sustained vowel /a/ using PRAAT software.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Harmonic to noise RatioBaseline (preoperative), 1 month postoperative, and 3 months postoperativeHarmonic to Noise Ratio, will be obtained from sustained vowel /a/ using PRAAT software. Unit of Measure: dB

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTShaimaa Bakia, Lecturer
shaimaa.saleh@med.bsu.edu.eg+201145335408
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShaimaa Ahmed Bakia

Lecturer of Phoniatrics

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026