Skip to content

A Model for Continuous Care of Fragile Patients

Un Modello di Presa in Carico Continua Del Paziente Fragile

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07299344
Acronym
AFTER
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-12-23
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fragile and More Vulnerable, Functional Decline, Neurological Disorders, Orthopedic Disorders

Keywords

Functional Monitoring, Functional Decline, Medically Fragile Patients, Neurological Disorders, Orthopedic Conditions, Rehabilitation, Proactive Care Model, Continuous Patient Management, Rehabilitation Setting, Early Detection of Functional Changes, telemedicine

Brief summary

This observational study aims to monitor functional status and identify potential declines in the functioning of medically fragile patients with neurological and/or orthopedic conditions, representing an added value for ensuring appropriate patient management. This approach improves system efficiency and supports a proactive strategy that promotes the appropriate use of resources.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, observational, non-profit study. Primary Objective: To compare functional and cognitive test results at discharge from La Residenza rehabilitation center (Rodello - CN- Italy) with remote assessments at patients' homes, demonstrating that Timed Up and Go (TUG) and GPCog tests, validated in-person, can be reliably administered via telemedicine. Secondary Objectives: To monitor motor and cognitive function remotely at 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge, assessing clinical course and disease progression, and evaluating patient condition as stable, improved, or deteriorated. Study Timeline and Sample Size: Recruitment is expected from September 2025 to March 2026, with last follow-up in March 2027 and an additional 6 months for data analysis and publication. A total of 100 patients (50 orthopedic, 50 neurological) will be enrolled, accounting for a 25% expected loss, based on power calculations for paired t-tests comparing in-person and remote assessments.

Interventions

OTHERTelemedicine-Based Functional Monitoring

This intervention provides structured functional monitoring of medically fragile patients with neurological and/or orthopedic conditions using telemedicine. Patients undergo MMSE, Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, TUG, GPCog, and SF-36 assessments at discharge and during follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with remote monitoring is also evaluated. All remote assessments are performed via the TESI eViSus BioCare® system on mobile devices, allowing early detection of functional decline and supporting proactive patient management.

Sponsors

Casa di Cura La Residenza di Rodello (CN, Italy)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult medically fragile patients with one of the following neurological conditions: mild-to-moderate stroke (Rankin ≤ 3), Multiple Sclerosis (EDSS ≤ 6.5), Parkinson's disease or parkinsonisms, neuromuscular diseases; or orthopedic conditions: femur, pelvis, or humerus fracture. * Able to walk independently, with or without assistive devices. * Adequate cognitive function (MMSE ≥ 24). * Patient or caregiver owns and can use a mobile device with internet/data connection. * Presence of a cognitively capable, cooperative caregiver willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with severe neurological or orthopedic conditions who cannot walk independently, even with assistive devices. * Patients with moderate or severe cognitive impairment (MMSE \< 24). * Patients with Barthel Index \> 60. * Patients or caregivers unable to use a mobile device or without internet/data connection. * Patients without a cooperative, cognitively capable caregiver.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance Between In-Person and Telemedicine Assessments of Functional and Cognitive Performance5-10 days after dischargePercentage of patients for whom the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test differs by less than 3.5 seconds and the GPCog test differs by less than 3 points between in-person and telemedicine assessments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCog) Score3, 6, and 12 months after dischargeGeneral Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCog), total score range 0-9. Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-9)
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)Baseline and 12 months after dischargeModified Rankin Scale score assessing global disability. Range 0-6, where 0 = no symptoms and 6 = death. Higher scores indicate worse disability. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-6)
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily LivingBaseline and 12 months after dischargeBarthel Index score assessing independence in activities of daily living. Range 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater independence. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-100)
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Performance3, 6, and 12 months after dischargeThe Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility by measuring the time it takes (in seconds) for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Lower times indicate better functional mobility. Unit of Measure: Seconds (s)
Patient Satisfaction With Remote Monitoring3, 6, and 12 months after dischargePatient satisfaction assessed using a validated satisfaction questionnaire (e.g., Likert scale 1-5). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Unit of Measure: Score on a Likert scale (1-5)
Caregiver Satisfaction With Remote Monitoring3, 6, and 12 months after dischargeCaregiver satisfaction assessed using a validated satisfaction questionnaire (e.g., Likert scale 1-5). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction. Unit of Measure: Score on a Likert scale (1-5)
SF-36 Composite Scores (Physical and Mental Component Summaries)At discharge and 12 months after dischargeShort Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey assessing quality of life across multiple domains. Scores range 0-100 for each domain. Higher scores indicate better perceived health status. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-100)

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactMichele Dotta, Dr.
mdotta@aslcn2.it+39.0172.1408670

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026