Skip to content

A Study on the Effect of CGM Alone on Glycemic Metrics in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Not Using Insulin, Without Additional Interventions

A Study on the Effect of CGM Alone on Glycemic Metrics in Type 2 Diabetes Patients Not Using Insulin, Without Additional Interventions

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07298850
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-12-23
Start date
2024-09-30
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes, Continuous glucose monitoring, Non-insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes

Brief summary

This study evaluates the effect of using a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system on blood sugar control in people with type 2 diabetes who do not use insulin. Participants will wear a CGM device (CareSens Air) for a total of two weeks. During the first week, the device will be set to blinded mode, meaning participants cannot see their glucose readings. During the second week, the device will be switched to unblinded mode, allowing participants to view their glucose levels and trends in real-time. The study aims to determine if simply seeing real-time glucose data can help patients improve their blood sugar control (such as increasing the time their blood sugar is in the target range) without receiving additional structured education on diet or exercise. Researchers will compare the glucose data collected during the blinded week with the data from the unblinded week.

Interventions

DEVICEContinuous glucose monitoring

All participants are adults with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Participants will wear a real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) device (CareSens Air) for a total of two weeks. The intervention consists of two consecutive phases: 1. Week 1 (Blinded Mode): Participants wear the CGM but cannot view their glucose readings. This period establishes baseline glycemic data. 2. Week 2 (Unblinded Mode): The same CGM session continues, but the mode is switched to unblinded. Participants can view their real-time glucose levels and trend arrows. Throughout the study, no additional structured education (e.g., diet or exercise coaching) or medication adjustments by the investigators are provided. The study evaluates the effect of data visibility alone on glycemic metrics.

Sponsors

i-SENS, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL, 2-hour plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL during 75g OGTT, or random plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL with classic symptoms) 2. No medication changes in the past 3 months, and receiving treatment with lifestyle modification or oral antidiabetic drugs or GLP-1 receptor agonists 3. Ages 19 - 80 years old 4. Patients who have voluntarily signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

1. Type 1 diabetes patients 2. Insulin users 3. Patients who have changed oral hypoglycemic agents within the past 3 months 4. Patients scheduled for hospitalization within 2 weeks 5. Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy within 1 month 6. Those who do not agree to the program 7. Those deemed unsuitable for participation in this clinical trial by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percentage of Time in Range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are within the target range of 70-180 mg/dL.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Percentage of Time Below Range (TBR) <70 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are below 70 mg/dL, indicating hypoglycemia.
Change in Percentage of Time Below Range (TBR) <54 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are below 54 mg/dL, indicating clinically significant hypoglycemia.
Change in Percentage of Time Above Range (TAR) >140 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are above 140 mg/dL. This metric assesses exposure to hyperglycemia, including mild elevations.
Change in Percentage of Time Above Range (TAR) >180 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are above 180 mg/dL, indicating hyperglycemia.
Change in Percentage of Time in Tight Range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are within the tight target range of 70-140 mg/dL.
Change in Mean Glucose Concentration From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Average glucose concentration (mg/dL) measured by the CGM device.
Change in Glucose Standard Deviation (SD) From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Standard Deviation (SD) of glucose readings, measuring glycemic variability.
Change in Glucose Coefficient of Variation (CV) From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Coefficient of Variation (CV) calculated as (SD / Mean Glucose) \* 100, measuring glycemic variability.
Change in Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2GMI is an estimated HbA1c level calculated from the mean glucose concentration derived from CGM data.
Change in Percentage of Time Above Range (TAR) >250 mg/dL From Week 1 (Blinded) to Week 2 (Unblinded)Week 1 and Week 2Percentage of time glucose readings are above 250 mg/dL, indicating severe hyperglycemia.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026