Skip to content

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism Exploration of MR-61 in Delaying the Progression of Myopia

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism Exploration of MR-61 in Delaying the Progression of Myopia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07298824
Enrollment
164
Registered
2025-12-23
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2025-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia Progressing

Keywords

Myopia,Probiotics,Gut microbiota

Brief summary

To investigate whether probiotic MR-61 can assist in slowing down the progression rate of myopia (a prospective randomized controlled study).

Detailed description

To investigate whether probiotic MR-61 can assist in slowing down the progression rate of myopia (a prospective randomized controlled study).

Interventions

BIOLOGICALInvestigational Bifidobacterium Preparation MR-61

Oral administration of the investigational probiotic powder MR-61. The primary component is Bifidobacterium. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.

OTHERPlacebo for MR-61

Oral administration of a matched placebo powder. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.

Sponsors

Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Myopia is defined as spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -0.5D. 2. Aged between 3 and 18 years, with no restriction on gender. 3. Cylinder power ≤ 1.50D; anisometropia of SE between both eyes ≤ 1.50D. 4. The subject has sufficient compliance with the study follow-up; the subject or their guardian has the intention to receive treatment and has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of other concomitant ocular diseases; 2. Abnormal findings on clinical slit-lamp examination; 3. Existence of amblyopia, manifest strabismus, esotropia, or other congenital ocular diseases; 4. Individuals with abnormal intraocular pressure or abnormal axial length of the eye; 5. Either or both parents having a spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -6.00D; 6. Other conditions inconsistent with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Spherical Equivalent RefractionMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The change in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) from baseline to each follow-up visit, measured in diopters (D). SER is calculated as the spherical power plus half of the cylindrical power. A negative change indicates an increase in myopia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Binocular AnisometropiaMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The difference in spherical equivalent refraction between the two eyes, measured in diopters (D).
Change in Axial LengthMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The growth value of ocular axial length, measured in millimeters (mm).
Change in Anterior Chamber DepthMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The change in depth of the anterior chamber of the eye, measured in millimeters (mm).
Change in Lens ThicknessMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The change in thickness of the crystalline lens, measured in millimeters (mm).
Change in Vitreous Cavity DepthMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The change in depth of the vitreous cavity, measured in millimeters (mm)
Change in Far Phoria DegreeMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The degree of heterophoria for distance vision, measured in prism diopters (PD).
Change in Corneal CurvatureMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The change in corneal curvature (keratometry), measured in diopters (D).
Score on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25)Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.Visual quality and vision-related quality of life is assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25). The overall composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better visual function and quality of life.
Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.Cognitive function is assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a widely used screening test for cognitive impairment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal. As probiotic supplementation may influence cognitive function, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Score on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.Gastrointestinal symptoms are assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), a validated questionnaire covering reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 (no discomfort) to 6 (very severe discomfort). A higher total or subscale score indicates more severe gastrointestinal symptoms (worse outcome). As probiotic supplementation may influence gastrointestinal function, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Score on the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.Participant adaptation and overall quality of life are assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), a validated generic quality of life instrument. It covers physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment domains. The total score is transformed to range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better quality of life and better adaptation. As probiotic supplementation may influence overall well-being, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Change in gut microbiota composition and diversity assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencingFecal samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for sequencing analysis.Fecal samples collected before and after intervention are analyzed using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Key metrics include changes in alpha diversity indices (e.g., Shannon Index, observed species), beta diversity (e.g., weighted/unweighted UniFrac distance), and relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (e.g., phylum Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio, genus Bifidobacterium).
Change in concentrations of fecal and serum metabolitesFecal and blood serum samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for metabolite analysis.Targeted metabolomic analysis is performed on fecal and blood serum samples. Concentrations of specific metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, or inflammatory cytokines) are measured and reported in nanomolar (nM) or picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) concentrations, as applicable.
Change in Near Phoria DegreeMeasured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.The degree of heterophoria for near vision, measured in prism diopters (PD).

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactYifeng Yu, Ph.D
171018170@qq.com13979180258

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026