Skip to content

Effect of Arestin-Enhanced SRP on Periodontal and Glycemic Outcomes in Diabetics

Effectiveness of Scaling and Root Planing With and Without Minocycline Microspheres (Arestin) in Improving Periodontal and Glycemic Outcomes in Diabetic Patients With Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07298057
Enrollment
42
Registered
2025-12-22
Start date
2026-02-06
Completion date
2028-06-01
Last updated
2026-02-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontitis, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Keywords

Scaling and Root Planing, Arestin, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Brief summary

Periodontitis is a prevalent chronic inflammatory disease that exacerbates systemic inflammation and poses challenges for glycemic control in diabetic patients. While scaling and root planing (SRP) remains the cornerstone of periodontal therapy, adjunctive treatments such as Arestin (minocycline microspheres) have shown promise in enhancing clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the impact of adding Arestin to SRP on periodontal pocket closure, glycemic control, and systemic inflammation in diabetic patients with periodontitis.

Interventions

DRUGlocal antibiotic application of topical minocycline

Scaling and Root planing + local application of Arestin ( Minocycline microsphere)

PROCEDUREScaling and Root Planing

Only scaling and root planing

Sponsors

Case Western Reserve University
Lead SponsorOTHER
OraPharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c ≥ 7.0% and ≤9.5%) 2. Diagnosed with moderate to severe periodontitis (≥5 mm probing pocket depth in at least 6 distinct interproximal sites, on different teeth) 3. At least 16 teeth present 4. No periodontal treatment in the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

1. Allergy to minocycline or tetracycline 2. Unable to receive or to tolerate local anesthesia 3. Unable to tolerate tooth instrumentation with ultrasonic instruments. 4. Require IV sedation to receive scaling and root planing 5. Use of antibiotics within the past 3 months 6. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 7. Morbid Obesity (BMI 40+) 8. Smokers or patients with poorly controlled systemic diseases other than diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pocket ClosureBaseline, 3 Months, 6 MonthsPocket Depth (PD ≤4 mm)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Glycemic Control (HbA1c)Baseline, 3 Months, 6 MonthsChanges in Blood Sugar Level
Changes in C-reactive Protein Level (CRP)Baseline, 3 Months, 6 MonthsChanges in Systemic Inflammation

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTGian Pietro Schincaglia, DDS, PhD
gxs486@case.edu216-368-4412
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGian Pietro Schincaglia, DDS, PhD

Case Western Reserve University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026