Migraine, Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Autonomic Nervous System, Headache (Migraine), Headache, Chronic Pain, mHealth, Breathing
Conditions
Keywords
heart rate variability biofeedback, migraine, headache, chronic pain, remotely delivered
Brief summary
Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders, characterized by recurrent headaches, sensitivity to light and movement, nausea, and autonomic dysregulation. Although mind-body interventions like biofeedback have shown their efficacy, they remain underutilized due to barriers such as transportation, time constraints, lack of awareness, stigma, and cost. A targeted approach to enhancing HRV is HRV biofeedback (HRVB), a technique using visual or auditory feedback to help people regulate HRV through slow-paced breathing and positive emotional regulation to promote ANS balance and emotional resilience. Investigators will conduct a remotely delivered pilot RCT of an 8-week, 10 min/day, novel app-based HRVB intervention compared to a sham control intervention (matching intervention time and attention with no biofeedback component) in adult with chronic migraine. Investigators hypothesize data collected from the study will: a) support the feasibility and acceptability of the remotely delivered app-based HRVB intervention among adults with chronic migraine, and b) provide insights into refining the intervention by examining patterns of change in migraine and psychological outcomes from pre- to post-intervention.
Detailed description
This study is a randomized controlled trial aimed at examining the effect of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) among people with chronic migraine. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether HRVB can positively impact the psychosocial health and well-being of those living with chronic migraines. Building upon our prior pilot RCT (IRB study ID: STUDY00018977; ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06546163), which demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of HRVB in college-aged women with disordered eating, investigators propose to examine the feasibility of a HRVB intervention using the device investigators have successfully implemented remotely, incorporating video guides and Zoom-based coaching for smartphone app set-up and use. Investigators will conduct a remotely delivered pilot RCT of an 8-week, 10 min/day, novel app-based HRVB intervention compared to a sham control intervention (matching intervention time and attention with no biofeedback component) in adult with chronic migraines. There will be 30 participants who experience chronic migraines that will participate in the study and they will be randomly assigned to either the HRVB intervention group or the control group (15 for each group). Participants will first attend a baseline orientation meeting during which they complete baseline measures and will be asked to complete 28 days of a 5-10 minute daily diary survey about their migraine-related experiences. After the 28 days, participants will attend a zoom training meeting during which they complete a 5-minute heart rate measurement using a small earlobe sensor device that investigators will mail to participants , will be randomly assigned to the HRVB group or sham control group, and be asked to complete the daily diary assessments for another 28 days. After 8 weeks since the baseline and 4 weeks since group assignment, participants will attend a final zoom meeting to complete follow-up measures and the heart rate measurement. Investigators hypothesize data collected from the study will: a) support the feasibility and acceptability of the remotely delivered app-based HRVB intervention among adults with chronic migraines, and b) provide insights into refining the intervention by examining patterns of change in migraine and psychological outcomes from pre- to post-intervention.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALBaseline Survey
Baseline surveys contain a series of scaled questions, including sociodemographic variables (age, sex, etc), information about migraine frequency and intensity, Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Grade Chronic Pain Scale Revised (GCPS-R), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), and treatment expectations.
BEHAVIORALHeart rate variability biofeedback
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will receive a standardized HRV sensor and accompanying smartphone application, along with a 30-40-minute HRVB training session focused on using biofeedback signals to generate a resonant frequency pattern of HRV (coherence) following baseline data collection. Participants will be asked to practice their HRVB skills at home for 10 minutes per day over a 8-week period.
BEHAVIORALSham Control Group
Participants randomized to the sham control arm will receive a standardized HRV sensor and accompanying smartphone application, along with a 30-40-minute sham breathing training session following baseline data collection. Participants will be asked to practice their sham breathing exercises at home for 10 minutes per day over an 8-week period.
Sponsors
Arizona State University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Individuals aged 18 years or older 2. Chronic migraine as determined by the Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM) assessment 3. Access to a smartphone and Wi-Fi 4. Fluent in English.
Exclusion criteria
1. Major medical (e.g., cancer, HIV/AIDS) or psychiatric illness (e.g., schizophrenia) 2. Conditions that would potentially interfere with accurate detection of HRV data (i.e., medications that alter heart rhythms, indications of cardiac conduction abnormalities \[e.g., heart arrhythmias\], having a pacemaker or heart transplant) 3. Any form of mind-body intervention (3 or more times per week) during the past 3 months.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes from Baseline Migraine Frequency at 28 days | One month after baseline (T2), 8 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after T2) (T3) | Migraine frequency will be assessed by the change from baseline in monthly (28-day) migraine days or moderate/severe headache days, assessed by the end of day headache daily diary . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Emotional Regulation Questionnaire | Basline (T1) and 8 weeks after baseline (T3) | Emotional regulation strategies will be measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (ERQ) (10 items, 7-point Likert scale; 1= strongly disagree, 7= strongly agree). The ERQ has two subscales: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. The ERQ has been used and validated in studies of psychosocial interventions for migraine patients. Individual scores on the PCS can range from 10 to 70 with higher scores indicating a greater frequency of use of emotional regulation strategies (Cronbach's a = 0.76-0.83). |
| Changes from 1-month after baseline (T2) Heart Rate Variability measurement at T3 | One month after baseline (T2), 8 weeks after baseline (4 weeks after T2) (T3) | The InnerBalance from HeartMath will be used to collect HRV data using a 5-minutes neutral protocol (we call waiting at the bus stop implying that no particular intent for breath or mindful state is to be evoked) to understand the benefits of HRVB. In addition, HRV measures will be obtained for the 10-minute paced breathing period per day to understand the effects of paced breathing on migraine during the intervention period. The following precautions will be provided as instructions to participants prior to data collection: no coffee, tea, or caffeinated drinks such as energizing drinks in the 2 hours before the data collection, and no alcohol consumption during 24 hours prior to the data collection. |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale | Baseline (T1) and 8 weeks after baseline (T3) | An individual's pain experience will be measured using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) (13 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=not at all, 4= all the time ). The PCS has three subscales: rumination, magnification, and helplessness. The PCS has been used and validated in studies of psychosocial interventions for migraine patients. Individual scores on the PCS can range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating a worse pain experience . (Cronbach's a = .87). |
| Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | Baseline (T1) and 8 weeks after baseline (T3) | Severity of insomnia will be measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) (7 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0=None, 4=Very severe). The ISI has been used and validated in studies of psychosocial interventions for migraine patients. Individual scores on the DASS-21 can range from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more sever insomnia (Cronbach's a = 0.74). |
| Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised (GCPS-R) | Baseline (T1) and 8 weeks after baseline (T3) | Chronic pain severity will be measured using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised (GCPS-R) (5 items, 5-point Likert scale; 0 = Not at all, 4 = Extremely). The GCPS-R is one of the most frequently used and validated scales in studies of psychosocial interventions for migraine patients.The scores on the GCPS-R can can be classfied form Grade 0 (no chronic pain) to Grade 3 (high impact chronic pain) (Cronbach's a = 0.87-0.94). |
| Depression Anxiety Stress Scale - Short Form (DASS-21) | Baseline (T1) and 8 weeks after baseline (T3) | General psychological distress will be measured using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) (21 items, 4-point Likert scale; 0= Did not apply to me at all, 3= Applied to me very much). The ERQ has three subscales: depression, anxiety, and stress. The ERQ has been used and validated in studies of psychosocial interventions for migraine patients. Individual scores on the DASS-21 can range from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating greater levels of general psychological distress (Cronbach's a = 0.74). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed