Skip to content

Single Vs Multi-strain Probiotics for Preterm Neonates

Evaluation of the Clinical and Growth-related Effects of Probiotics in Preterm Infants: A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07296718
Enrollment
249
Registered
2025-12-22
Start date
2023-05-15
Completion date
2025-10-15
Last updated
2025-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Necrotizing Enterocolitis of Newborn, Sepsis Newborn, Growth, Feeding Intolerance

Keywords

Probiotics, Preterm neonates, Single vs Multiple strain

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized control clinical trial is to determine if probiotics can prevent mortality and morbidity in preterm neonates. It also evaluates effects of probiotics on feeding pattern and growth. It will also learn about the comparative effects of single vs multiple strain probiotics. It aims to answer: Does probiotics improve the health and growth outcomes in preterm neonates in our population? Does single vs multiple strain of probiotics have difference in effects? Participants will: Participants given either single strain or multiple strain probiotics for 28 days post birth. Data about mortality, morbidity, feeding pattern and growth (weight, height, head circumference gain) recorded on daily basis.

Detailed description

This trial is single-centered, parallel, multi-arm, 1:1:1 randomized, blinded, placebo controlled clinical trial. It compares 3 groups; Group P1 (Placebo), Group P2-Single Strain probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) and Group P3- Multiple strains probiotic ( Bifidobacterium BB-12, Lactobacillus paracasei, L casei-431, Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4) for preventing preterm neonatal morbidities, improving feeding tolerance and overall growth. Primary objective: The primary objective of our trial will be to compare the incidence and severity of Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) from the time of trial participation till the end of trial treatment (28 days) according to Bell's grading criteria. Secondary objectives: All these outcomes will be measured from the day intervention started to the end of supplementation (28 days) * To evaluate incidence of sepsis, intracerebral haemorrhage and periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity and bronchopulmonary dysplasia) * To estimate the time to full enteral feeding (i.e., ≥150 ml/kg/day) and feeding tolerance based on Davy's Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS). * To determine the effect of probiotics on growth (weight, height, and head circumference) of premature babies * To assess comparative efficacy of single strain vs combination probiotics for aforementioned objectives Framework/hypothesis: The experimental group P2 (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) and Group P3- ( Bifidobacterium BB-12, Lactobacillus paracasei, L casei-431, Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4) are superior to control group (Placebo) as preventing NEC and other morbidities in preterm neonates, thus improving feeding tolerance and overall growth.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDextrose 10%

P1

DRUGBifidobacterium BB-12, Lactobacillus paracasei, L casei-431, Streptococcus thermophilus TH-4

Multiple Strain

Sponsors

Madiha, MPhil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 36 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Preterm babies of gestational age \<35+6days, birth weight \<2500 grams, received and tolerated at-least one feed within 72 hours of birth and informed consent from parents or guardian.

Exclusion criteria

* Neonates with major congenital malformations, gastrointestinal anomalies, early onset sepsis (C-reactive protein (CRP) \>10 mg/L in the first 72 h of life) and renal insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)From the day intervention started to day 28 of supplementationBell's classification used for grading and diagnosis

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neonatal SepsisFrom the day intervention started to day 28 of supplementationClinical sepsis is defined as condition with at least two signs of systemic inflammatory response (e.g. temperature \>38 C or \<36.5 C, tachycardia \> 200/min etc.), one laboratory sign (e.g. C-reactive protein \>20mg/L) but no proof of causative agent in blood culture. Clinical sepsis with proof of blood culture positive for causative agent was defined as confirmed sepsis.
Feeding IntoleranceFrom the day intervention started to day 28 of supplementationA gastrointestinal tolerance score, based on gastric residual volume, emesis, abdominal distension, number of stools and nil per oral days was calculated to identify and score feeding intolerance. Each score as 1. A score of \>2 was considered gastric intolerance.
WeightFrom the day intervention started to day 28 of supplementationWeight measured in grams
Body lengthFrom the day intervention started to day 28 of supplementationMeasured in millimeters daily once
Head CircumferenceFrom the day study started to day 28 of supplementationMeasured in millimeters

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026