Skip to content

Expert Consensus on the Clinical Management of Melasma: A Delphi Method Study

Expert Consensus on the Clinical Management of Melasma: A Delphi Method Study

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07296549
Enrollment
15
Registered
2025-12-22
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2025-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Melasma, Melasma (Facial Melasma)

Keywords

Melasma, consensus, expert panel, delphi method

Brief summary

This study aims to gather expert opinions on the best ways to treat and manage melasma, a common skin condition characterized by dark patches on the face. Using a method called the Delphi Method, a group of dermatologists and other specialists will participate in several rounds of surveys to share their insights and reach a consensus on the most effective treatments and management strategies. The goal is to create a set of evidence-based guidelines that can help doctors provide more consistent, effective care for patients with melasma. The study will ensure that all experts' opinions are anonymous, and the results will be shared to improve treatment practices worldwide.

Detailed description

This study is designed to establish expert consensus on the management and treatment of melasma through a Delphi Method approach. The Delphi Method is a structured, iterative process where a panel of specialists-primarily dermatologists and other healthcare professionals experienced in treating melasma-will be asked to respond to a series of surveys. These surveys will allow experts to share their opinions on the most effective treatments, diagnostic criteria, and management strategies for melasma. The study will be conducted in multiple rounds: Round 1: Experts will provide open-ended feedback on their experiences and perspectives on melasma treatment. Round 2: Based on the responses from Round 1, a refined set of questions will be circulated to clarify or expand on the issues raised. Round 3: A final round will help refine and solidify the consensus on treatment approaches and care protocols. The experts' feedback will be anonymized to ensure unbiased responses, and each round will be followed by analysis to identify areas of agreement and disagreement. The goal is to achieve a high level of consensus (usually around 70%) on key treatment recommendations and best practices for managing melasma. This process will result in evidence-based guidelines for melasma treatment that healthcare providers can use to standardize care and improve patient outcomes. These guidelines will help address the variability in treatment practices and ensure that patients receive the most effective and up-to-date care based on expert consensus.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Venus Research Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Board-certified or equivalent dermatologist, * Minimum of 5 years of post-certification clinical experience in the management of MELASMA, * Willingness to participate in all Delphi rounds.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or unwillingness to complete Delphi rounds. * Lack of clinical experience with MELASMA * Industry representatives without direct clinical practice

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Consensus on Diagnostic & therapeutic Criteria for Melasma6-12 weeksEstablishment of expert consensus on core domains of melasma diagnosis and management measured by the proportion of statements reaching predefined consensus agreement after completion of delphi rounds

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026