Skip to content

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Anesthesia Techniques in Elective Cesarean Deliveries

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Anesthesia Techniques in Elective Cesarean Deliveries

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07295080
Enrollment
91
Registered
2025-12-19
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2026-05-01
Last updated
2026-06-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Regional Anaesthesia in Cesarean Operations

Keywords

dural puncture epidural anesthesia, epidural anesthesia

Brief summary

Neuraxial techniques are the most effective form of labor analgesia in contemporary obstetric anesthesia practice, predominantly through the use of epidural (EPL) and combined spinal-epidural (CSE) techniques. Although drug combinations employed in these methods have advanced, the onset time, block quality, and side effect profiles of both techniques still require further improvement. The epidural technique is associated with minimal side effects; however, it may occasionally present variable block characteristics such as slow onset, inadequate sacral spread, unilateral or patchy sensory block, motor impairment, and epidural catheter failure. The dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique is performed by inserting a spinal needle through the shaft of the epidural needle to create a single dural perforation, after which an epidural catheter is placed into the epidural space without administering any drugs into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). All medications for analgesia or anesthesia are delivered into the epidural space via the catheter. The dural puncture is thought to provide a conduit that facilitates the translocation of drugs from the epidural space into the subarachnoid space, which is believed to account for the clinical features observed with the dural puncture epidural technique advantageous in obstetric patients. Additionally, the process of dural puncture with a spinal needle through the epidural needle allows cerebrospinal fluid return to serve as a "confirmatory" definitive endpoint for the position of the epidural needle tip within the epidural space. The investigators designed this study to determine whether the dural puncture epidural technique, compared with epidural, could improve the onset time and block characteristics of anesthesia in elective cesarean deliveries. Compared with the epidural technique, the dural puncture epidural approach has been shown to improve the onset of sacral block as well as the spread of anesthesia and analgesia-characteristics that are particularly advantageous in obstetric patients. Additionally, the process of dural puncture with a spinal needle through the epidural needle allows cerebrospinal fluid return to serve as a "confirmatory" definitive endpoint for the position of the epidural needle tip within the epidural space. The investigators designed this study to determine whether the dural puncture epidural technique, compared with epidural, could improve the onset time and block characteristics of anesthesia in elective cesarean deliveries.

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the effects of dural puncture epidural (DPE) versus standard epidural anesthesia on the time to surgical anesthesia onset in patients scheduled for elective cesarean section. • Study Population: Pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section • Compared Techniques: Dural Puncture Epidural Group → A dural puncture will be performed with a 27G spinal needle before the placement of the epidural catheter. Standard Epidural Group → An epidural catheter will be placed directly without dural puncture. • Primary Outcome: Time from anesthesia administration to onset of surgical anesthesia (defined as time to achieve sensory block at the T5 dermatome level). • Secondary Outcomes: Incidence of hypotension Intraoperative ephedrine requirement Need for additional doses Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) Time to regression of sensory block Motor block assessment (Bromage scale) Study Design: Prospective: Patients will be identified before anesthesia administration and evaluated going forward. Randomized: Patients will be randomly assigned to either the dural ponksiyon epidural or standard epidural group. Controlled: The two groups will be compared to analyze the effects. Single-Center: The study will be conducted at a single hospital. Inclusion Criteria * Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery * No comorbidities * Age between 18-40 years * Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m² * Term pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks * No contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection, history of prior spinal surgery, etc.) Parameters to Be Assessed All parameters will be assessed by the investigator both intraoperatively and postoperatively in the ward. These include: * Sensory block level (evaluated every minute as a study-specific parameter) * Blood pressure * Heart rate * Oxygen saturation * Requirement for ephedrine * Requirement for additional epidural doses * Incidence of post-dural puncture headache (at 24 and 48 hours) * Motor block assessment (using the Bromage Scale) Note: All evaluated parameters are part of standard monitoring, with the exception that sensory block level will be specifically assessed every minute for the purposes of this study. \- Exclusion Criteria * Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia * Refusal to participate in the study Withdrawal and Termination Criteria * Patient's decision to withdraw from the study * Conversion to general anesthesia * Administration of intrathecal and/or intravenous drugs

Interventions

OTHERDural puncture epidural (DPE) anaesthesia

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle, followed by dural puncture with a 27G spinal needle. Without administering any drug into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

OTHERstandart epidural anesthesia

The epidural space will be accessed using an 18G epidural needle. An epidural catheter will then be inserted, through which anesthesia will be administered.Its placement will be confirmed with a test dose of 2 ml of 2% lidocaine. Following the test dose (after excluding signs of intrathecal or intravenous injection), a mixture consisting of 7.5 ml of 2% prilocaine, 7.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, and 100 µg of fentanyl (2 ml) will be administered in 5-ml increments at 3-minute intervals.

Sponsors

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery * No comorbidities * Age between 18-40 years * Body mass index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m² * Term pregnancy ≥ 37 weeks * No contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, infection, history of prior spinal surgery, etc.)

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia * Refusal to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
onset time of sensory block20 minutesThe time from the administration of anesthesia to the onset of surgical anesthesia (the time it takes for the sensory block to reach the Thoracic 5 (T5) dermatome).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of hypotensionperioperativea 20% reduction from baseline blood pressure
intraoperative ephedrine requirementperioperativetotal intraoperative ephedrine dose
requirement for supplementery dosingperioperativeFailure to achieve sensory block at the Torakal 5 (T5) level within 20 minutes or the occurrence of perioperative pain
Postdural puncture headache (PDPH)day 2Postoperative headaches will be evaluated at the 24th and 48th hours using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time to the onset of sensory block regressionday 1The duration of sensory block regression from the Thoracic 5 (T5) to the Thoracic 10 (T10) and Lumbar 1 (L1) dermatomal levels
Assessment of motor blockday 1The degree of motor block will be assessed using the Bromage score

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOResra uyar turkyilmaz

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 11, 2026