Adjuvants, Anesthesia, Subarachnoid Block
Conditions
Keywords
Subarachnoid block, Adjuvants
Brief summary
This study compares the use of intrathecal nalbuphine versus intrathecal tramadol as adjuvant agents to local anaesthetics in subarachnoid block for lower-limb orthopaedic surgeries. The primary objective is to determine whether there is a meaningful difference between the two drugs in terms of quality and duration of intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. Secondary outcomes include onset and efficacy of sensory and motor block, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of adverse effects, and perioperative hemodynamic stability. By evaluating these parameters, the study aims to identify which adjuvant provides superior analgesic benefits with fewer side effects in patients undergoing lower-limb orthopedic procedures.
Detailed description
The effectiveness of Intrathecal Nalbuphine 1mg versus Intrathecal Tramadol 20mg as adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in Subarachnoid block for orthopaedic surgeries of the lower limbs is studied. Primary outcomes of the study are onset of sensory block, onset of motor block, intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia measured on visual analog scale. Secondary outcomes were incidence of side-effects and the need for rescue analgesia.
Interventions
intrathecal tramadol 20mg with Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine
intrathecal nalbuphine 1mg with 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* ASA Physical Status 1 and 2 Undergoing surgical correction of lower limb fracture
Exclusion criteria
* hypersensitivity to opioids or local anesthetics patient refusal
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of spinal anesthesia | up to 24 hours post operatively | Time until first rescue analgesia at VAS \<4. (Visual Analog scale measures subjective pain intensity on a continuous scale. Score 0 means no pain while 10 means most pain possible) |
Countries
Pakistan