Skip to content

The Effect of Low Intensity With BFR on Stroke Patients

The Effect of Low Intensity Training With Blood Flow Restriction Versus Traditional Resistance Exercise on Lower Extermity Isokinetic Torque and Balance in Ischemic Stroke Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07292675
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-12-18
Start date
2025-12-13
Completion date
2026-05-13
Last updated
2025-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Stroke

Keywords

BFR , Stroke

Brief summary

To compare the effects of low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) versus traditional resistance training on lower limb isokinetic torque and dynamic balance in ischemic stroke survivors.

Detailed description

Ischemic stroke commonly results in reduced lower extremity muscle torque and impaired balance, affecting mobility and fall risk. Traditional resistance training improves muscle function but may not be suitable for all patients due to the need for high mechanical loads. Low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) has emerged as an alternative that enhances muscular adaptation at lower loads. However, limited data exists on its effect on isokinetic torque and functional balance in stroke patients. This study aims to fill this gap using objective isokinetic measurements and validated balance scales.

Interventions

OTHERlow-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction

Low-Intensity BFR Means (for Quads) It involves resistance 20-30% 1RM combined with partial arterial + full venous restriction using a cuff placed on the proximal thigh.

High-intensity quadriceps training in stroke patients focuses on using 60-80% of 1RM to improve strength, motor unit recruitment, and functional mobility. Exercises such as loaded sit-to-stand, leg press, and step-ups are commonly used to target the quadriceps safely. Training intensity is guided by a perceived exertion of 7-9/10 while maintaining proper supervision to prevent falls. This approach enhances knee stability, gait efficiency, and overall functional independence.

Sponsors

Delta University for Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The patients in control group will receive high intensity resistance training

Intervention model description

Groups: * Group A: Low-intensity BFR resistance training * Group B: Traditional resistance training

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • First-ever ischemic stroke (3-12 months post-stroke) * Aged 30-40 years * Can walk independently or with an aid * Medically stable and able to follow instructions

Exclusion criteria

* •Hemorrhagic stroke * Deep vein thrombosis or peripheral vascular disease * Orthopedic conditions affecting lower limb * Severe cognitive impairment or uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Isokinetic torqueBaseline

Contacts

Primary Contactibrahim A abu ella, Phd
ibrahimneuron@gmail.com+201008442281

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026