Skip to content

Impact of Nut Consumption on Mental Health in Young Adults

Impact of Nut Consumption on Mental Health in Young Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07292610
Acronym
NUTS4BRAIN-RCT
Enrollment
135
Registered
2025-12-18
Start date
2025-11-24
Completion date
2027-04-30
Last updated
2025-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety, BDNF, Cognition, Depression Disorder, General Wellbeing, Mental Health, Stress

Keywords

RCT, Dietary Intervention, Nut consumption, young adults, Randomized controlled trial, Mental Health, Depression, Anxiety, Cognition, University students, Sleep quality, Academic performance, Walnuts, Almonds, Pistachios, Hazelnut, BDNF

Brief summary

Nuts have a high nutrient density, and numerous studies have reported their cardiometabolic benefits. Although observational studies in adults have indicated a potential link between nut consumption and improved mental health, there is still insufficient evidence from experimental studies to draw firm conclusions about this association.

Detailed description

Nuts are widely recognized for their high nutrient density and their multiple reported cardiometabolic benefits. They are rich in monounsaturated (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated (PUFAs) fatty acids (including omega-3 alpha-linolenic acid and omega-6 linoleic acid) as well as antioxidants and compounds with anti inflammatory properties. Observational studies in adults have suggested a potential association between nut consumption and improved mental health, including a reduced risk of depression and enhanced mood. However, evidence from experimental studies remains limited and often inconclusive. Early adulthood (ages 18-24) represents a critical developmental period marked by substantial physical, psychological, and social changes, and it is also a stage during which mental health problems commonly emerge. The Nuts4Brain-RCT will investigate the impact of a 6-month mixed-nut intervention on mental health symptoms, cognitive functioning, sleep quality, overall well-being, health-related quality of life, and biochemical mediators of brain function and mental health in young adults.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTmixed nuts. Group A

Participants will be instructed to consume a single daily dose of nuts (30 g/day of mixed nuts). Nuts will be provided free of charge for the entire study period (6 moths). The participants will be instructed to incorporate nuts into their regular diet and consume them in any way they prefer. Upon completion of the intervention, participants will be instructed to continue their usual dietary and lifestyle habits, without any specific restrictions or incentives directed toward nut consumption. After 6 months have passed since the end of the intervention, all participants will be called for a final session (12 months) in which all data evaluated throughout the study will be collected

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTmixed nuts. Group B

Participants will be instructed to consume two daily doses of nuts (60 g/day of mixed nuts). Nuts will be provided free of charge for the entire study period (6 months). The participants will be instructed to incorporate nuts into their regular diet and consume them in any way they prefer.Upon completion of the intervention, participants will be instructed to continue their usual dietary and lifestyle habits, without any specific restrictions or incentives directed toward nut consumption. After 6 months have passed since the end of the intervention, all participants will be called for a final session (12 months) in which all data evaluated throughout the study will be collected

OTHERcontrol group

Participants will be instructed to maintain their regular diet without any specific dietary instructions or intervention.

Sponsors

European Union
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

The allocation sequence will be concealed from the research team until the allocation time. Participants will be informed of their group assignment upon completion of the randomization process.

Intervention model description

A 6-month, randomized, single-blinded, three-arm, dose-response, clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 24 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all the following criteria to be considered eligible for selection and randomization: Inclusion Criteria: * Age: Participants must be between 18 and 25 years old. * Academic Status: Participants must be enrolled as university students. * Field of Study: Participants may come from any academic program offered at the Cuenca Campus, including Nursing, Social Work, Education, Fine Arts, Engineering, Journalism, and Teaching. Participants will be excluded from the study if they have any of the following conditions, based on self-reported information:

Exclusion criteria

* Allergies: Known nut allergy. * Self-reported cardiovascular, metabolic, gastrointestinal or mental health disorder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DepressionDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in symptoms of depression assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory Version II (BDI-II). Each of the 21 items includes four statements of increasing severity, and a total score (ranging from 0 to 63) is calculated, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
AnxietyDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in symptoms of anxiety assessed with The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7). The GAD-7 consists of seven questions asking individuals to rate the frequency and severity of specific anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks.The total score ranges from 0 to 21, calculated by summing the scores of all seven items. A score of 10 or greater is considered a reasonable cut-off point for identifying possible cases of GAD that may require further clinical evaluation
StressDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in symptoms of stress assessed with The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). The PSS-10 is a widely used, 10-item self-report questionnaire that measures an individual's perception of stress over the past month. Scoring involves reverse-scoring four positive items and summing all 10. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more perceived stress. Scores can be interpreted generally as low (0-13), moderate (14-26), or high (27-40) stress.
Episodic memoryDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The Picture Sequence Memory Test assesses episodic memory by requiring participants to encode and recall the temporal order of a sequence of visually presented everyday events. After presentation, individuals are asked to reconstruct the sequence in its original order, allowing evaluation of visual episodic memory and learning across trials. Test time: 7 minutes. This test is one of the measures included in the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, which is administered on an iPad by qualified personnel.
Working memoryDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The List Sorting Working Memory Test (LSWM), part of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Batery, assesses working memory by having individuals recall and sequence visually and auditorily presented stimuli (like animal/food pictures) in size order (smallest to largest). Test time: 7 minutes.
Cognitive flexibilityDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The Dimensional Change Card Sort Test is a standardized measure of cognitive flexibility. Participants are required to sort cards according to different rules (e.g., color or shape) and to adapt their responses when the sorting dimension changes. Test time: 5 minutes. This test is one of the tests that will be determined using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, which will be administered on an iPad by qualified personnel.
Processing speedDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test is a standardized measure of processing speed. Participants are asked to quickly determine whether two visual patterns are the same or different, emphasizing speed and accuracy of visual perception and decision-making. Test Time: 4 minutes. This test is one of the tests that will be determined using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, which will be administered on an iPad by qualified personnel.
Inhibitory control and attentionDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test is a standardized measure of inhibitory control and selective attention, core components of executive function. Participants are required to focus on a central target stimulus while inhibiting interference from surrounding distractor stimuli. Performance reflects the ability to maintain attention, suppress competing responses, and resolve cognitive conflict. Test Time: 3 minutes. This test is one of the tests that will be determined using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, which will be administered on an iPad by qualified personnel.
Brain Derived Neurotrophic FactorDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood concentration of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a biochemical mediator of brain functioning

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adherence to the Mediterranean DietDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in adherence to the mediterranean diet assessed with the MEDAS questionnaire. Scoring: Each item is scored with 1 point if the criteria for adherence to the Mediterranean diet are met, and 0 points if they are not. The total score ranges from 0 to 14 points. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet. A common cut-off point of ≥9 is often used to define good adherence to the diet.
ResilienceDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in resilience assessed with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC 10). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not true at all) to 4 (true nearly all the time). The total score is calculated by summing the values of all 10 items. Total scores range from 0 to 40. Higher scores on the CD-RISC 10 indicate greater resilience and a better ability to cope with adversity and bounce back from difficult experiences.
Risk of eating disordersDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12The SCOFF questionnaire (an acronym derived from the initials of its English questions: Sick, Control, One stone, Fat, Food) is a brief and simple, five-question screening tool designed to detect the possible presence of eating disorders (EDs), such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. The total score can range from 0 to 5. A score of two or more points is considered a positive screening result and suggests a suspicion of an ED that requires a detailed formal clinical assessment.
WeightDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Weight in kilograms will be assessed twice using a calibrated digital scale (Scale Seca® 861) with participants barefoot and in light weight clothing.
HeightDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Height will be measured twice with a stadiometer (Wall stadiometer Seca® 222), with participants standing upright, barefoot, and with the sagittal midline aligned to the wall.
Body Mass Index (BMI)Day 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12BMI will be calculated as weight divided by height squared (kg/m2).
Body fat percentageDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Body fat percentage will be assessed twice using the bioimpedance analysis system under standardized conditions (morning, fasting, post-void, after 15 minutes rest, barefoot, with controlled temperature and humidity).
Sleep qualityDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in quality of sleep assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI consists of 19 individual self-rated questions (and 5 optional questions for a roommate/bed partner) that are grouped into seven component scores. Each of the seven components is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no difficulty and 3 indicates severe difficulty. The scores of these components are summed to produce a global PSQI score, which ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.
Muscular strenghtDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Measured through handgrip strength using a calibrated dynamometer (Digital dynamometer TKK 5401 Grip-D (Takey®, Tokyo, Japan), and standing long jump for lower body strength. Handgrip: Kilograms (kg). Horizontal jump: Centimeters (cm).
Phisical activityDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in phisical activity assessed with the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The data collected with the IPAQ can be reported as a continuous measure (estimation of total energy expenditure in MET-minutes per week) or categorically (classifying individuals into low, moderate, or high physical activity levels): Continuous Score: Total energy expenditure is calculated using specific formulas that assign MET (metabolic equivalent) values to each activity type (walking=3.3 METs, moderate=4.0 METs, vigorous=8.0 METs). Categorical Score: Participants are classified into three levels of physical activity based on predefined criteria related to the duration, frequency, and intensity of activities.
Lipid profileDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood lipid profile (Cholesterol (Total, HDL-c, LDL-c), triglycerides)) to examine underlying mechanisms.
Glucose levelsDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood glucose levels to examine underlying mechanisms.
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)Day 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood HbA1c levels to examine underlying mechanisms.
Adherence verificationDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Adherence to nut consumption intervention measured by blood levels of vitamin E
Blood pressureDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Blood pressure will be measured using an automated device (OMRON® M5-I (Omron Healthcare UK Ltd.)). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be assessed twice, with a 5-minute interval between measurements. Participants will be seated in a quiet environment, with the right arm semi-flexed at heart level.
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)Day 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in health-related quality of life assessed with the SF12 questionnaire. It consists of 12 questions that cover the same eight health domains as the longer SF-36: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health. The 12 items are used to create two main summary measures through a complex, norm-based scoring algorithm: Physical Component Summary (PCS): A single score representing physical health status. Mental Component Summary (MCS): A single score representing mental and emotional health status. Interpretation of Scores: Scores for both PCS and MCS typically range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better health and functioning.
Inflammatory biomarkersDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood inflammatory markers (e.g. hs-CRP) to examine underlying mechanisms
Concentration of vitamins and mineralsDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in blood concentration of specific vitamins and minerals (e.g., vitamins B9, B12, D, iron, and magnesium) to examine underlying mechanisms
Body imageDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in body image perception using The Standard Figural Stimuli (SFS). Measurement Purpose: Perceived Body Image: The figure the individual selects as most representative of their current body size. Ideal Body Image: The figure the individual would like to have. Body Dissatisfaction: The discrepancy between the perceived image and the ideal image. A larger difference indicates greater body dissatisfaction.
Screen timeDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Screen time will be assessed using an ad hoc questionnaire that records the number of hours of leisure time participants spend watching television, using a mobile phone, using a computer for work-related purposes, or engaging with other electronic devices, both on weekdays and during weekends.
Social media addictionDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in social media addiction through Social Network Addiction Questionnaire, 6-item version (ARS-6). The scale typically consists of 6 items, with one item representing each of the six components of addiction. Response Scale: Responses are typically given on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., from 1 = Not at all to 5 = Always). Scoring: Item responses are summed to obtain a total score, ranging from 6 to 30. Higher scores indicate a greater risk or severity of social media addiction.
SociodemographicDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Sociodemographic information such as age, sex, date of birth, country of origin, marital status, housing type, medication use, and family history of mental or cardiovascular disorders.
Drugs consumptionDay 0, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Changes in drugs consumption assessed with the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST). The ASSIST generates substance-specific risk scores that categorize use into low, moderate, or high-risk categories. Higher scores indicate a greater risk of substance-related health and social problems, guiding the type of intervention needed (e.g., brief intervention or referral to specialist treatment).

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactArthur Eumann Mesas, PdD
arthur.emesas@uclm.es+34 926053716
Backup ContactMiriam Garrido-Miguel, PhD
miriam.garrido@uclm.es+34 926054003

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026