Skip to content

To Compare the Clinical Outcomes of FemtoLASIK and ICL Implantation in Treating Moderate Myopia Focusing on Refractive Stability, Contrast Sensitivity and High Order Aberrations.

Comparing Visual Outcomes After FemtoLasik and Implantable Collamer Lens in Treatment of Myopia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07291986
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-18
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2025-05-06
Last updated
2025-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Moderate

Keywords

FemtoLASIK, ICL, myopia, HOA, contrast sensitivity

Brief summary

Compare the clinical outcomes of FemtoLASIK and ICL implantation in treating moderate myopia.

Detailed description

The clinical outcomes of FemtoLASIK and ICL implantation focusing on refractive stability, contrast sensitivity and high order aberrations.

Interventions

PROCEDUREFemtoLASIK

FemtoLASIK surgery for simple and compound myopic patients

PROCEDUREICL implantation

ICL implantation for simple and compound myopic patients

Sponsors

Walid Osama Abdel Rahman Nour El Din
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Group I - FemtoLASIK subgroup: * Age range: 21-40 years. * Stable myopia for at least one year (refractive change ≤ 0.50 D). * Spherical equivalent between -4.00 D and -8.00 D. * Corneal thickness ≥ 500 μm, residual stromal bed \> 300 μm and percentage of tissue altered \< 39%. * No evidence of keratoconus or ectatic changes on corneal topography/tomography. * Mesopic pupil diameter ≤ 6.5 mm. * Absence of ocular surface disease or significant dry eye symptoms. * No history of prior ocular surgery or trauma. Group II - ICL subgroup: * Age range: 21-40 years. * Stable myopia (with or without astigmatism) for ≥1 year. * Spherical equivalent between -4.00 D and -8.00 D. * Anterior chamber depth ≥ 2.8 mm from endothelium. * Endothelial cell density ≥ 2500 cells/mm². * White-to-white and sulcus-to-sulcus diameters suitable for ICL sizing. * Clear crystalline lens with no signs of early cataract. * No history of intraocular surgery, uveitis, or glaucoma.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with mild myopia (\<-4D) or high myopia (\>- 8D) or hyperopia. * Patients with media opacity. * Patients with associated ocular pathology. * Patients with corneal topography not fitting to either treatment modalities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Refractive Stability (%)From enrollment up to 6 months postoperativecalculating the ratio between spherical equivalent postoperative to that of preoperative
Contrast Sensitivity (log CS)From enrollment up to 6 months postoperativeusing specialized charts and measured in logarithmic contrast sensitivity (log CS) units
High Order Aberrations (μm)From enrollment up to 6 months postoperativeusing the RMS value to quantify the total magnitude of wavefront deviations in the eye in micrometers

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026