Skip to content

Blood Flow Restriction Training in Acute Geriatric Rehabilitation

Blood Flow Restriction Training in Acute Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Its Effects and Safety in Hospitalized Older Adults.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07291765
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-18
Start date
2026-01-01
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcopenia in Elderly

Brief summary

Background: Older adults have a reduced ability to build and maintain muscle mass due to age-related changes in the muscular system. The resulting sarcopenia can lead to a number of health problems and limitations, such as an increased risk of falling and reduced mobility, which can affect quality of life and increase the risk of disease. To increase muscle mass and strength, high-intensity resistance training with loads of 70 to 85% of the repetition maximum (1RM) is recommended. However, this type of training poses a major challenge in the rehabilitation sector, as there is also an increased risk of injury due to physical limitations in old age. According to current research, low-intensity occlusion training could therefore represent a safe and effective training alternative. The aim of this study is therefore to examine the feasibility and effects of blood flow restriction training (BFR) on general health in older adults in a rehabilitative setting.

Detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled trial with a pre-post design. Participants will be recruited from the of St. Marien Hospital Geriatric Rehabilitation Center in Cologne, Germany. Patients will be randomized into 2 groups. The intervention group will receive BRF training on a stationary cycling ergometer five times a week over a period of two weeks, while the control group will receive sham-BFR training.

Interventions

DEVICEStationary Bike + Blood-Flow-Restriction

Cycling Intensity individualized + 60% LOP

DEVICEStationary Bike + Sham-Blood-Flow-Restriction

Cycling Intensity individualized + 20mmHg

Sponsors

University Hospital, Bonn
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults \>65 years with a two week hospitalized acute rehabilitation after a fracture closed to the hip joint

Exclusion criteria

* Sickle Cell Anemia * Iatrogenic changes of the vessels at the place of the tournqiuet application (e.g. Stents)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle StrengthPre-Rehabilitation to Post-Rehabilitation (after 2 weeks)Isometric Maximal Strength Test of the Knee Extensors (in kg)
Timed Up and Go TestPre-Rehabilitation to Post-Rehabilitation (after 2 Weeks)The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) is a widely used English-language assessment for measuring functional mobility and fall risk in older adults. It records the time required to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, and sit down again.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTAlexander Franz, Dr. med., B.Sc.
alexander.franz@ukbonn.de+491703750718

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 15, 2026