Skip to content

Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Thickness Articular-Side Rotator Cuff Tears: Transtendon Versus Conversion Repair Techniques

Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Thickness Articular Side Rotator Cuff Tears Using Transtendon Versus Conversion Repair Techniques.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07289659
Enrollment
54
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2019-10-01
Completion date
2023-03-30
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Partial Thickness Articular-Side Rotator Cuff Tears

Brief summary

This prospective randomized clinical trial compared two arthroscopic techniques for repairing partial-thickness articular-side rotator cuff tears: transtendon repair and conversion repair. Eligible patients with symptomatic tears exceeding 50% of tendon thickness, confirmed by MRI and intraoperative assessment, were randomly assigned to either repair technique. Functional outcomes, range of motion, complications, and MRI healing were assessed up to 24 months postoperatively

Interventions

PROCEDUREArthroscopic Conversion Repair

Patients undergo arthroscopic conversion repair, where the partial-thickness tear is converted to a full-thickness tear and repaired using standard arthroscopic techniques.

PROCEDUREArthroscopic Transtendon Repair

Patients undergo arthroscopic transtendon repair, preserving the intact bursal surface of the tendon while repairing the articular-side defect using suture anchors.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients suffering symptomatic PT-RCTs exceeding 50% of the tendon thickness, documented by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed by arthroscopy intraoperative. * Failure of nonoperative management for at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* Prior shoulder surgery. * Severe concomitant pathologies including glenohumeral arthritis, advanced subscapularis tear, and biceps tendon rupture. * Associated Bankart lesion. * Patients with uncontrolled Diabetes mellites.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) ScoreBaseline and 24 months postoperatively
Constant-Murley Score (CMS)Baseline and 24 months postoperatively
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for PainBaseline and 24 months postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of Motion (ROM)Preoperative and 24 months postoperatively.Measure the range of: 1. Forward flexion 2. Abduction 3. External rotation 4. Internal rotation
Complication RateUp to 24 months postoperativelyNumber of cases with: Stiffness Persistent pain Infection
MRI Healing Status12 months postoperativelyNumber of cases with complete healing in MRI

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026