Skip to content

Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm

A Comparative Study Between Sheathless RIRS, Traditional Access Sheath RIRS, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS in the Management of Renal Stones ≤ 2 cm: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07289230
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2024-12-30
Completion date
2025-08-30
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Calculi, Nephrolithiasis, Renal Calculi, Urolithiasis

Keywords

Kidney stones, Renal calculi, Urolithiasis, Endoscopic management of kidney stones, Retrograde intrarenal surgery, Flexible ureterorenoscopy, Ureteral access sheath, Suction ureteral access sheath, Sheathless retrograde intrarenal surgery, Minimally invasive urologic surgery

Brief summary

This completed randomized clinical study was designed to compare three different techniques of retrograde intrarenal surgery (retrograde intrarenal surgery) for the treatment of kidney stones that are 2 centimeters or smaller. Retrograde intrarenal surgery is a minimally invasive procedure in which a flexible scope is passed through the urinary tract to reach the kidney and fragment the stone. The clinical study included three groups of patients. The first group underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery using a traditional ureteral access sheath, which is a hollow tube placed in the ureter to facilitate the passage of instruments and help control pressure inside the kidney. The second group underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery using a suction ureteral access sheath, which combines the function of a traditional sheath with gentle suction to help remove stone fragments and reduce internal pressure. The third group underwent sheathless retrograde intrarenal surgery, in which the flexible surgical scope is inserted directly without the use of any ureteral access sheath. The purpose of this clinical study was to determine whether these three approaches differ in terms of stone clearance, operative time, intraoperative complications such as bleeding or fluid leakage, and early postoperative complications such as fever or infection. All participants were adults with a single kidney stone between 1 and 2 centimeters, normal kidney function, and no active infection or anatomical abnormalities. All procedures were performed at Ain Shams University Hospitals using the same surgical equipment and technique to ensure comparability between groups.

Interventions

PROCEDURETraditional ureteral access sheath retrograde intrarenal surgery

This intervention involves performing retrograde intrarenal surgery using a traditional ureteral access sheath to facilitate entry of the flexible ureteroscope and maintain controlled intrarenal pressure. The procedure includes endoscopic fragmentation of renal calculi using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser device and placement of a double-J ureteral stent at the end of surgery.

PROCEDURESuction ureteral access sheath retrograde intrarenal surgery

This intervention uses a suction ureteral access sheath that provides continuous negative pressure during retrograde intrarenal surgery. The system assists in evacuation of stone debris and helps control intrarenal pressure while the flexible ureteroscope and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser device are used for stone fragmentation. A double-J ureteral stent is placed after the procedure.

PROCEDURESheathless retrograde intrarenal surgery

This intervention involves performing retrograde intrarenal surgery without the use of any ureteral access sheath. The flexible ureteroscope is introduced directly over a guidewire to access the renal collecting system for laser fragmentation of the stone using a holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser device. A double-J ureteral stent is inserted following completion of the procedure.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned in a parallel fashion to one of three study arms: traditional ureteral access sheath retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), suction ureteral access sheath retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), or sheathless retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Each participant received only one of the three techniques, and the groups were followed and compared concurrently regarding stone clearance, operative time, intraoperative complications, and early postoperative complications.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients aged 18 years or older. * Symptomatic unilateral single renal stone with a maximal diameter from 1 centimeter to 2 centimeters. * Normal kidney function based on routine laboratory tests. * Patients willing and able to provide written informed consent to participate in the clinical study.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with active urinary tract infection (UTI) until appropriate treatment is completed and infection is cleared. * Patients with anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract (for example, congenital or acquired structural abnormalities). * Pregnant patients. * Patients who are medically unfit for general anesthesia. * Patients with multiple renal stones in the same kidney or bilateral renal stones.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone-free rate assessed by non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tractOne month after surgery (non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract performed approximately 30 days postoperatively)Stone-free status is evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract performed after surgery. Residual stone fragments are classified into four grades: Grade A, no stones detected (absolute stone-free); Grade B, residual fragments less than or equal to 2 millimeters (relative stone-free); Grade C, residual fragments 2.1 to 4 millimeters (relative stone-free); and Grade D, residual fragments greater than 4 millimeters (significant residual stones). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving stone-free status, defined as Grade A (absolute stone-free) and, in a secondary analysis, Grades A to C combined (clinically insignificant residual fragments).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Operative time for retrograde intrarenal surgeryDuring the surgical procedure on the day of surgeryOperative time is measured in minutes from the insertion of the endoscopic instruments at the beginning of retrograde intrarenal surgery until completion of the procedure, including placement of the double-J ureteral stent. The metric is the mean operative time and distribution of operative time for each study arm.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026