Skip to content

Protocolised Management of Phosphate Replacement Trial

A Comparison of Two Phosphate Replacement Protocols for Critically Ill Patients Treated in an Intensive Care Unit: a Cluster, Crossover, Comparative Effectiveness, Randomised, Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07288944
Acronym
PROMPT
Enrollment
2400
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2026-01-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critical Care, Intensive Care, Hypophosphatemia, Phosphate Deficiency, Protocol Optimization

Keywords

Phosphate Protocol, Critical Care, Intensive Care, Hypophosphatemia, Phosphate Deficiency

Brief summary

The aim of this cluster, crossover, randomised controlled trial is to compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients. We hypothesise that protocolised restricted phosphate replacement, compared to protocolised liberal phosphate replacement, will result in reduced administration of phosphate with similar clinical outcomes. All eligible Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients will be included during their admission with the selected protocol for that period as per usual practice and treatment standards.

Detailed description

This study looks to compare liberal and restrictive phosphate replacement protocols (each arm is a current standard of care already used in practice) to investigate whether restrictive phosphate replacement in critically ill patients leads to reduced phosphate administration and/or equivalent patient outcomes. Derangements of serum phosphate concentrations are common among ICU patients; high and low levels variably associated with worse outcomes. The PROMPT trial will compare two standard arms of treatment for the replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients. Phosphate is currently replaced routinely in ICU's however there is not a standardised evidence-based guideline to effectively guide phosphate administration for ICU patients This is a cluster, crossover, electronic medical record integrated, randomised, controlled trial. Sites (not patients) will be randomised to wither the liberal or restrictive phosphate replacement protocol for a 6-month period, followed by a 1-month washout period, before switching to the next protocol for the preceding 6-month period. The allocated phosphate replacement protocol will be updated in the electronic medical record to be followed; this process is already part of normal clinical practice.

Interventions

OTHERLiberal Phosphate Replacement Protocol

The liberal group, a recommendation for phosphate replacement would be given if the serum phosphate concentration was 0.79 mmol/L, but not if 0.80 mmol/L.

OTHERRestrictive Phosphate Replacement Protocol

The restrictive protocol will recommend phosphate replacement to commence at a threshold of 0.50 mmol/L, and the liberal protocol at 0.80 mmol/L.

Sponsors

Queensland University of Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Caboolture Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A cluster, crossover, electronic medical record (EMR)-integrated, randomised, controlled trial (RCT) that will compare liberal versus restrictive protocolised replacement of phosphate in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients admitted to participating intensive care units during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

* There will be no specific

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
non-inferiority for days alive and free of the intensive care unit (ICU) up to 30 days (DAF-ICU-30)30 Days post study enrolmentThe primary outcome will be assessed as non-inferiority in the number of days alive and free of ICU within 30 days from study enrolment. ICU length of stay will be used to calculate. This measure is reported on a continuous scale ranging from 0 (worst outcome: death or full ICU stay) to 30 (best outcome: alive and ICU-free for all 30 days), where higher scores indicate a better outcome. The difference between groups will be expressed as a mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patients receiving phosphatetotal proportion of patients receiving phosphate throughout 12-month study periodProportion of patients receiving any phosphate replacement
Hospital Length of Stayhospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study periodTotal time spent in hospital - hospital admission time to hospital discharge time
Hospital Mortalityhospital admission to hospital discharge throughout 12-month study periodhospital mortality rates for all participants throughout study period
Phosphate usageindividual arm and total quantities used over 12-month study periodQuantities of intravenous and oral phosphate replaced (total and individually)
Mechanical ventilation hourshospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study periodHours of invasive mechanical ventilation
Tracheal reintubationhospital admission to hospital discharge, throughout 12-month study periodTracheal intubation requirement during admission
cardiac rhythm disturbanceICU admission to ICU discharge, throughout 12-month study periodSymptomatic cardiac rhythm disturbance (cardiac arrhythmia that requires treatment with chemical or electric cardioversion)

Contacts

Primary ContactMahesh Ramanan
mahesh.ramanan@health.qld.gov.au+61 7 5433 8888
Backup ContactEmma L Williams
emma.williams6@health.qld.gov.au+61 488 474 254

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026