Skip to content

Exploring the Effects of Exercise Combined With BFRT on Healthy and Patients With CKD

The Feasibility and Effects of Exercise Training Combined With Blood Flow Restriction Training on Exercise Capacity and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07288905
Enrollment
120
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2025-10-04
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2025-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease

Brief summary

Investigate the effects of exercise training on the cardiopulmonary function and exercise capacity in healthy and CKD patients

Detailed description

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a condition characterized by impaired kidney function lasting for more than 3 months, as estimated by the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which is classified into stages 1 to 5. Common symptoms include swelling, fatigue, and high blood pressure. Previous studies have indicated that physical inactivity in patients with CKD, often due to fatigue, leads to decreased physical fitness. In addition, secondary complications such as muscle mass loss and weakness are frequently observed, especially in the advanced stages of CKD. To address this vicious cycle, aerobic and resistance training have been shown to mitigate these effects. Previous studies have reported that such exercise interventions can reduce fatigue and improve VO₂ peak in individuals with CKD. However, these exercise programs often involve high loads and frequencies, which may not be feasible for some CKD patients, particularly those with comorbidities such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease. The effectiveness of blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise compared with high-load training has been demonstrated in older adults, showing improvements in functional ability and muscular adaptation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of incorporating blood flow restriction during exercise on cardiopulmonary function and exercise capacity in patients with CKD.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALAerobic exercise

The aerobic exercise intervention will utilize stationary bike. The program will be conducted 2 times per week over a 12 weeks

BEHAVIORALBlood flow restriction

Blood flow restriction intervention will combined aerobic exercise and resistance exercise. The program will be conducted 2 times per week over a 12 weeks

BEHAVIORALResistance exercise

The resistance exercise will bilateral leg extension. The program will be conducted 2 times per week over a 12 weeks

The participants will received self-care technique and home-based exercise approach

Sponsors

National Cheng Kung University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Healthy Inclusion Criteria: • Aged 20\ 85 years old

Exclusion criteria

* Severe uncontrolled metabolic diseases (e.g., hyperthyroidism, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, etc.) * Severe pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases (e.g., pulmonary hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia) * Presence of a cardiac pacemaker or a history of myocardial infarction within the past six months * Severe musculoskeletal or neuromuscular disorders (e.g., advanced arthritis, limb amputation, post-polio syndrome, Parkinson's disease) * Unstable vital signs (e.g., systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, requiring vasopressors, or resting heart rate \>100 bpm) * Prone to bruising * Recent inflection \< 1 month * Pregnancy * Kidney function impairment * Cancer * Simultaneously participating in other research CKD Inclusion criteria: * Aged 20\ 85 years old * eGFR\< 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 over 3 months * Stable condition without worsening in the past 3 months * Ability to understand and follow verbal commends and cooperate with an exercise training program

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diaphragm excursion and thicknessChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Diaphragm excursion (unit: mm) and thickness (unit: mm) are examined by diaphragmatic ultrasound when a participant performs maximal inspiration and expiration
Exercise capacityChange form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)A cardiopulmonary exercise test collects gases (including measures of oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min), which can be used to estimate exercise capacity

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart rate variability (Low Frequency power, LF)Change form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Low frequency power (LF, in ms²) reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic modulation.
Heart rate variability (LF/HF Ratio)Change from baseline (0 week) to follow-up (16 weeks)LF/HF ratio represents sympathovagal balance.
Heart rate variability (High Frequency power, HF)Change from baseline (0 week) to follow-up (16 weeks)High frequency power (HF in ms²) reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity.
Pulmonary function testChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Pulmonary function test is examined by spirometry, which measures the ability to inhale and exhale air over time. The results include forced vital capacity (FVC in L), forced exploratory volume in the first second (FEV1 in L), and the FVC/FEV1 ratio.
Functional capacityChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Functional capacity is examined by 6 minute walking test (6MWT, in m)
Functional abilityChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Functional ability is examined using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, where the time taken (in seconds) to complete the test is recorded.
Sit-and-Reach TestChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Flexibility is examined by the sit and reach test (unit: cm).
Handgrip StrengthChange from baseline (0 week) to follow-up (16 weeks)Maximal voluntary handgrip strength. (unit: N)
Heart rate variability (Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal Intervals, SDNN)Change form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Heart rate variability (HRV) is examined to assess the autonomic nervous system. Standard Deviation of Normal-to-Normal Intervals (SDNN, in ms)reflects overall heart rate variability and autonomic function
Neck Muscle StrengthChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Maximal voluntary contraction of neck muscles. (unit: N)
Knee Extensor StrengthChange from baseline (0 week) to follow-up (16 weeks)Maximal voluntary contraction of the knee extensor muscles. (unit: N)
Maximum respiratory pressureChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (20 weeks)Maximum respiratory pressure is measured using a manometer, which records both maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), in cmH₂O.
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)Change form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 7-point scale questionnaire that measures the patient's level of fatigue. It contains 9 questions, and a total score of 36 points or higher indicates that the patient may be experiencing clinically significant fatigue and requires further evaluation.
Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL)Change form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)The Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL) questionnaire is a standard tool for patients with kidney disease. It contains several subscales, and the raw scores are converted into normalized scores, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)Change from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)The modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale consists of 4 levels that describe respiratory difficulty during daily activities; higher levels indicate more severe symptoms.
Short Form-36 (SF-36)Change from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)The Short Form-36 (SF-36) measures physical and social health status, with higher scores representing better overall health
Upper Limb Muscle StrengthChange from baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Maximal voluntary contraction of upper limb muscles. (unit: N)
Heart rate variability (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences, RMSSD)Change form baseline (0 week) to follow up (16 weeks)Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD in ms) represents short-term HRV and parasympathetic activity

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactKun-Ling Tasi, PhD
Kunlingtsai@mail.ncku.edu.tw886-6-2353535 Ext.5078
Backup ContactTing-Ying Wu, B.S
t66131036@gs.ncku.edu.tw886-6-2353535 Ext.5078

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026