Skip to content

Comparison of Eversion and Conventional Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy

Comparison of Operative and Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Eversion and Conventional Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07288164
Enrollment
129
Registered
2025-12-17
Start date
2025-05-15
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atherosclerosis Occlusive Disease, Endarterectomy, Carotid, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack

Brief summary

Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease is responsible for approximately 20% of strokes worldwide, and its treatment options include medical therapy, surgery, and stenting.Surgical management is prioritized over medical and stent based approaches and can be performed using either the conventional methed closed primarily or with a patch or the eversion technique.The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes of the eversion technique and the conventional method with primary closure.

Interventions

PROCEDURECarotid endarterectomy, conventional

In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods. The conventional method is performed with a longitudinal incision extending from the common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) up to the end of the plaque. The arteriotomy is then closed either primarily or with the use of a patch. In our study, we performed only the primary closure method..

PROCEDURECarotid endarterectomy, eversion

In this study, patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent conventional or eversion endarterectomy. Although the eversion technique is the oldest method, the conventional approach is still widely performed due to its ease of application, despite not being recommended in current guidelines. Therefore, our aim is to contribute to the literature by comparing these two methods.The eversion method is performed by transecting the internal carotid artery (ICA) from the common carotid artery (CCA). The arteriotomy is then closed in an end to side fashion.

Sponsors

Kastamonu University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

-Patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy, either emergently or electively

Exclusion criteria

* Patients younger than 18 years of age * Patients scheduled for concomitant cardiac surgery * Reoperations

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with stroke and death30 daysAll strokes and/or deaths occurring within 30 days after surgery
Number of participants with symptoms of occlusionPostoperative 30 daysEarly carotid restenosis or occlusion within 30 days after surgery

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026