Skip to content

A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Study Comparing the Efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis

A Comparison of Efficacy Between High-intensity Laser Therapy and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patient With Plantar Fasciitis; Single Blinded Randomize Controlled Study

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07287046
Acronym
HILT
Enrollment
28
Registered
2025-12-16
Start date
2026-02-28
Completion date
2027-02-20
Last updated
2026-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plantar Fasciitis

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (fESWT) in reducing pain in patients with plantar fasciitis. The study also examines the effects of HILT and fESWT on health-related outcomes, including VAS-FA, FFI, plantar fascia thickness, and adverse events. Researchers will compare HILT with fESWT as treatment options for patients with plantar fasciitis. Participants will receive either HILT or fESWT along with an exercise program. They will attend follow-up visits to assess outcomes at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 weeks after the first treatment.

Interventions

High-power laser therapy (iLUX® XP) was applied using a power output of 6 W, an energy density of 5 J/cm², and a spot size of 10 cm², delivering a total energy of 150 J per session. Treatment consisted of 6 sessions, administered twice per week for 3 weeks

Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT) using the DUOLITH® SD1 (STORZ Medical) was applied at a frequency of 4 Hz, starting at an energy flux density of 0.2 mJ/mm² and gradually increased as tolerated. Each session consisted of 2,000 shocks, for a total of 3 sessions (one session per week)

Sponsors

Mahidol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18-70 years * Pain was worse in the initial step after and an extended period of rest * Pain was decreased initially after the first steps but exacerbated with increased activity * VAS ≥ 4 * Pain was localized and sharp but not radiating, * Pain was reproduced with palpation of the plantar fascia

Exclusion criteria

* Have Wound/Infection/tumor in treatment area * History of foot trauma in 3 months * History of intervention at plantar fascia in 6 months such as Ultrasound therapy, steroid injection, surgery or botulinum toxin injection * Pain medication within one week before participation * Patient wasn't desired to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analog scale (VAS)Pre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatmenta pain rating scale based on self-reported measures of symptoms that are recorded with a single handwritten mark placed at one point along the length of a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between the two ends of the scale "no pain" on the left end (0 cm) of the scale and the "worst pain" on the right end of the scale (10 cm) Measurements from the starting point (left end) of the scale to the patients' marks are recorded in centimeters and are interpreted as their pain

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS-FA Thai versionPre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatmentThe parameter used to assess the level of pain in several foot activities, 0-100 point scale, a higher score means a better outcome
Foot function index Thai versionPre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatmenta self-reporting questionnaire covering several dimensions of foot function categorized in 3 subscales that quantify the impacts of foot problems on pain, disability and activity limitation. FFI use a horizontal numeric block rating scale with 10 equal size boxes ranging from 0 to 9. A higher score indicates a higher severity.
Thickness of plantar fasciitisPre-treatment, and 12-week post-treatmentThe plantar fascia thickness was measured at the point of plantar fascial insertion into the calcaneus with ultrasound machine in longitudinal view of tendon in both affected and healthy feet (mm). The quantitative measurement was achieved by recording the thickest part measured.
Adverse eventsPre-treatment, and at 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, and 12-week post-treatmentIncluding post-treatment soreness, burns, a burning sensation, and hematoma

Contacts

CONTACTPeerada Eurcherdkul, Doctor of Medicine
eurpeerada@gmail.com+6692-272-0652
CONTACTSuttinon Jitjai, Dortor of Medicine
+89-463-3401

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026