Skip to content

PRICE vs PEACE and LOVE in Adolescent Lateral Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation

PRICE vs PEACE and LOVE in Adolescent Lateral Ankle Sprain Rehabilitation: a Prospective Comparative Study of Muscle Strength and Dynamic Balance.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07287020
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-12-16
Start date
2022-02-02
Completion date
2025-01-14
Last updated
2025-12-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries, Lateral Ankle Sprain, Rupture of Ligaments at Ankle and Foot Level, Sprain of Lateral Ligament

Keywords

PRICE protocol, PEACE and LOVE protocol, Ankle sprain rehabilitation, Y-Balance Test, Biodex isokinetic testing

Brief summary

This study compared two early management strategies for adolescents with first-time lateral ankle sprain: the traditional PRICE protocol (Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the PEACE and LOVE rehabilitation framework (Protection, Elevation, Avoid anti-inflammatories, Compression, Education + Load, Optimism, Vascularization, Exercise). Seventy-six participants aged 12-17 years were randomized to one of the two treatment groups and followed for 12-15 weeks. Functional recovery was assessed at three time points using isokinetic dynamometry to measure ankle inversion and eversion strength, and the Y-Balance Test to evaluate dynamic balance. The study aimed to determine whether the PEACE and LOVE approach resulted in superior improvements in neuromuscular function compared to PRICE + NSAIDs. Outcomes were analyzed as side-to-side deficits between the injured and uninjured limbs.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized study evaluated two early management approaches for adolescents with first-time lateral ankle sprain. Participants aged 12 to 17 years who presented within 1 to 4 days of injury were randomized to either the PRICE protocol (Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or the PEACE and LOVE rehabilitation framework (Protection, Elevation, Avoid anti-inflammatories, Compression, Education + Load, Optimism, Vascularization, Exercise). Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with concealed envelope allocation. Outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. Both groups received initial protection using a lace-up ankle splint, and some participants received temporary plaster cast immobilization in the emergency department based on clinical symptoms. In the PRICE + NSAIDs group, early management focused on rest, cryotherapy, compression, elevation, and scheduled ibuprofen dosing according to body weight. Structured rehabilitation exercises were not introduced during the first 1 to 2 weeks. In the PEACE and LOVE group, cryotherapy and NSAIDs were avoided, and participants received education on tissue healing and early optimal loading. Home exercises included pain-free elastic resistance strengthening and basic balance training starting in the first week, with progressive neuromuscular and aerobic exercise in later phases. Functional recovery was assessed at 1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injury. Objective biomechanical outcomes included isokinetic ankle inversion and eversion strength and range of motion measured using a Biodex dynamometer at angular velocities of 60°/s and 120°/s. Dynamic balance was evaluated using the Y-Balance Test. All outcomes were analyzed as side-to-side deficits between the injured and uninjured limbs. The primary aim of the study was to compare functional recovery between the two treatment protocols over a 12-15-week period. Secondary aims included evaluating changes in dynamic balance, assessing the influence of early immobilization on outcomes, and documenting the time course of strength and mobility restoration. The study was conducted at the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences and received ethics approval prior to initiation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPRICE + NSAIDs protocol

A conservative management approach consisting of Protection, Rest, Ice, Compression, and Elevation. Includes scheduled ibuprofen dosing according to body weight for pain and inflammation control. The intervention focuses on symptom reduction through cryotherapy, activity restriction, and edema management during the early phase of recovery.

BEHAVIORALPEACE and LOVE protocol

A rehabilitation framework emphasizing Protection, Elevation, Avoidance of anti-inflammatories, Compression, and Education, followed by Load, Optimism, Vascularization, and Exercise. The intervention promotes early optimal loading, pain-free therapeutic exercise, neuromuscular training, and patient education to support tissue healing and functional recovery.

Sponsors

Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors performing ultrasound imaging, isokinetic strength testing, and Y-Balance assessments were blinded to treatment allocation. Participants and treating clinicians were not blinded due to the nature of the rehabilitation protocols.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups using a computer-generated simple randomization sequence with concealed envelope allocation. Each participant received only the intervention assigned at randomization, and no crossover occurred between groups. Both groups were followed in parallel for the full study period, and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 12 to 17 years First-time lateral ankle sprain Presentation within 1 to 4 days after injury No chronic ankle pain prior to the injury No fracture except minor avulsion fractures confirmed by imaging Ability to participate in follow-up assessments

Exclusion criteria

Previous ankle surgery History of chronic ankle pain or ankle instability Systemic diseases (e.g., inflammatory, metabolic, or autoimmune conditions) Neurological disorders affecting lower-extremity function Inability to perform isokinetic or balance testing Declined informed consent by the participant or legal guardian

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ankle inversion peak torque/body weight (%) deficit between injured and uninjured limbs at 60°/s1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injuryAnkle inversion peak torque normalized to body weight (Peak TQ/BW, %) is measured using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 60 degrees per second. For each assessment, peak torque values are collected for the uninjured and injured limbs and used to calculate a side-to-side deficit expressed as a percentage (uninjured minus injured limb).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Y-Balance Test composite score deficit between injured and uninjured limbs1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injuryDynamic balance is assessed using the Y-Balance Test (YBT). For each limb, participants perform three maximal reach attempts in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions, and a composite score is calculated by normalizing reach distances to limb length and multiplying by 100 percent. For each time point, a side-to-side deficit is calculated as the difference between the uninjured and injured limbs (uninjured minus injured limb). The secondary outcome is the change in this composite score deficit over time, comparing recovery between the PRICE + NSAIDs group and the PEACE and LOVE group.
Change in ankle inversion-eversion range of motion (ROM) deficit between injured and uninjured limbs1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injuryAnkle inversion and eversion range of motion (ROM, degrees) is measured using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 120 degrees per second. At each testing session, ROM is recorded for the uninjured and injured limbs, and a side-to-side deficit is calculated as the difference between limbs (uninjured minus injured limb). The secondary outcome is the change in ROM deficit over time at both testing velocities, comparing recovery between the PRICE + NSAIDs group and the PEACE and LOVE group.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ankle inversion peak torque/body weight (%) deficit at 120°/s1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injuryInversion peak torque normalized to body weight (Peak TQ/BW, %) is measured using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 120 degrees per second. For each testing session, peak torque values are recorded for the uninjured and injured limbs, and a side-to-side deficit is calculated (uninjured minus injured limb). This outcome evaluates changes in inversion strength deficit at the higher testing velocity over time.
Change in ankle eversion peak torque/body weight (%) deficit at 60°/s and 120°/s1-2 weeks, 5-7 weeks, and 12-15 weeks after injuryAnkle eversion peak torque normalized to body weight (Peak TQ/BW, %) is measured using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 120 degrees per second. For each velocity and at each time point, peak torque values for the uninjured and injured limbs are compared to calculate a side-to-side deficit (uninjured minus injured limb). This outcome evaluates changes in eversion strength deficit at both testing velocities over the course of rehabilitation.

Countries

Lithuania

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026