Skip to content

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery: A Comparative Study of Sclera, Pericardium, and Corneal Tissue

Optimizing Graft Selection in Glaucoma Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07285616
Enrollment
180
Registered
2025-12-16
Start date
2026-09-15
Completion date
2027-12-30
Last updated
2026-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

PRESERFLO, surgery, MicroShunt

Brief summary

Glaucoma refers to a group of progressive optic neuropathies that lead to permanent vision loss. Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally. In 2020, it was estimated to affect 76 million individuals worldwide, with projections indicating this number will rise to 111.8 million by 2040. In Canada, glaucoma affects an estimated 2.7-7.5% of individuals over the age of 50, contributing substantially to the national disease burden. This condition is linked to damage of the optic nerve due to elevated intraocular pressure (IOP; raised eye pressure), which results in the loss of retinal ganglion cells. Therefore, most of the treatments are guided towards reducing the IOP either via using laser, medications or surgery. Glaucoma surgery is typically reserved for cases where IOP remains uncontrolled while on maximum tolerated medical therapy and/or where glaucoma progression warrants surgery. The goal of many glaucoma surgeries is to divert aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival space, therefore reducing intraocular pressure. The device used for this purpose are the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt (Glaukos Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) (the documents will interchangeably use terms "stent" and "shunt" to refer to these devices in the text below). The device is implanted using the ab externo approach to channel fluid from the anterior chamber to the subconjunctival/subtenon space. To reduce postoperative fibrosis and inhibit fibroblast activity that could obstruct flow and lead to device failure, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or mitomycin C (MMC) are administered. Additionally, a double-layered closure of conjunctiva and Tenon's is performed to minimize Tenon's migration and blockage of tenon the stents. Despite these measures, stent encapsulation and failure are still too common requiring revisions and bleb needling in 2-20% of cases within the first 12 months of follow-up. This project will involve a series of studies evaluating graft selection in PreserFlo MicroShunt implantation, focusing on donor sclera, cornea, and pericardium as patch graft materials. First, the investigators will conduct a prospective, randomized study comparing clinical outcomes between these graft types. Outcomes of interest will include surgical success rates, post-operative hypotony, tube erosion, conjunctival complications, infection, and overall device longevity. Donor sclera has long been used as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage device surgery and is associated with low erosion rates and reliable long-term results. Corneal tissue is increasingly used due to its transparency and availability through eye banks, with demonstrated safety in ocular surface reconstruction and tube coverage. Pericardium is another durable, biocompatible option, historically applied in both cardiovascular and ocular surgery, and has shown effectiveness as a patch graft in glaucoma drainage implants. This comparison will extend to both primary implantation and revision surgeries, recognizing the high clinical relevance of graft performance in complex cases. Building on these results, the investigators will then perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of graft strategies, incorporating surgical time, post-operative management, complication rates, and need for re-operation. An economic model will be developed to evaluate costs and resource utilization associated with each material, providing valuable data for policy and surgical decision-making. Finally, the investigators will conduct a patient-reported outcome (PRO) study to assess patient comfort and satisfaction with different grafts. Surveys will evaluate domains such as foreign body sensation, cosmesis, and overall satisfaction at key time points (immediate post-operative period, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months). These results will highlight the patient perspective, an often underrepresented but critical factor in surgical innovation. Together, these studies will comprehensively assess graft selection from surgical, economic, and patient-centered perspectives, informing evidence-based practice in glaucoma care.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMicroShunt with Pericardial Patch Graft

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with pericardial patch graft to cover the tube.

PROCEDUREMicroShunt with Scleral Patch Graft

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor scleral patch graft to cover the tube.

PROCEDUREMicroShunt with Corneal Patch Graft

Placement of PreserFlo MicroShunt with donor corneal patch graft to cover the tube.

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 110 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18 years and older 2. Patients selected for PreserFlo microshunt surgery and XEN stent alone or in combination with cataract surgery. 3. Ability to comprehend the study procedures

Exclusion criteria

1. Unwilling or unable to give consent 2. Unable to come for scheduled post-operative visits 3. Pregnant or nursing women 4. Previous cyclodestructive procedures, scleral buckling procedures, or presence of silicone oil 5. Conjunctival scarring precluding a glaucoma surgery superiorly 6. Active iris neovascularization or active proliferative retinopathy 7. Vitreous in the anterior chamber for which a vitrectomy is anticipated. 8. Previous trabeculectomy, tube-shunt implantation, or surgeries that shunt aqueous outflow into the subconjunctival space

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) from Baseline to 12 Months12 monthsIOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg) at baseline, post-operative Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, and Month 12. The primary endpoint will be the mean change at 12 months.
Surgical Success Rate at 12 Months12 monthsProportion of eyes achieving target IOP (≤18 mmHg or ≥20% reduction from baseline) without additional glaucoma surgery, vision-threatening complication, or device removal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glaucoma medication burden12 monthsNumber of glaucoma medications used per patient, counted from the medication list at each follow-up (baseline, Month 3, 6, 12). Outcome reported as: Mean change in number of medications.
Need for re-operation12 monthsNumber and percentage of eyes requiring any additional glaucoma or device-related surgery during the study period. Outcome reported as: Count and proportion of eyes re-operated.
Bleb needling rate12 monthsNumber and proportion of eyes requiring bleb needling postoperatively to maintain or restore filtration.
Tube/patch graft exposure or erosion12 monthsClinically confirmed exposure or erosion of tube or patch graft, as documented on slit-lamp exam. Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of affected eyes.
Hypotony12 monthsIOP \< 5 mmHg on two consecutive visits measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mmHg). Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes meeting the definition.
Infection12 monthsAny endophthalmitis, blebitis, or wound infection confirmed on clinical exam. Outcome reported as: Number and percentage of eyes with infection.
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change12 monthsBCVA measured using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at 4 m (logMAR scale). Outcome reported as: Mean change in logMAR from baseline to 12 months (lower values = better vision).
Device survival (time to failure)Up to 12 monthsTime from surgery to defined surgical failure (loss of pressure control, device removal, or re-operation). Outcome reported as: Kaplan-Meier survival curve; median time to failure.
Patient-reported comfortImmediate postop (day 1), 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.Measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) where 0 = no discomfort and 10 = worst possible discomfort. Assessment points: Post-op Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD at each time point.
Foreign body sensationDay 1, 1 week, 3 weeks, 3 months.Evaluated using a Likert scale (1-5) where 1 = none and 5 = severe sensation. Assessment points: Day 1, Week 1, Week 3, Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD and proportion reporting moderate-to-severe sensation (≥4).
Cosmesis/satisfaction3 weeks and 3 months.Measured with a 5-point Likert scale assessing satisfaction with postoperative appearance (1 = very dissatisfied; 5 = very satisfied). Assessment points: Week 3 and Month 3. Outcome reported as: Mean ± SD; higher scores = greater satisfaction.
Health care resource use12 monthsNumber of postoperative visits, additional procedures, and unscheduled urgent encounters recorded per participant from the medical record. Outcome reported as: Mean count per participant and associated cost estimate (CAD).
Cost-utility12 monthsCalculated using trial-based costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) estimates derived from EQ-5D-5L utility weights. Outcome reported as: Incremental cost per QALY gained by graft type.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTPaige Campbell, MD
pcampbe1@ualberta.ca14039695473

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 25, 2026