Skip to content

Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of EUS vs MRCP for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Prospective Comparison of the Carbon Footprint of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) vs Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07283185
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-12-15
Start date
2025-12-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Choledocholithiasis

Brief summary

MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.

Detailed description

MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures. Prior research confirms that diagnostic EUS generates significantly less CO₂e per procedure compared to radiologic imaging. This study aims to support sustainable diagnostic choices by quantifying their environmental footprint.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Intermediate likelihood of CBD stone (per ESGE) * Undergoing either MRCP or EUS for evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* High or low likelihood category (per ESGE) * Undergoing both MRCP and EUS simultaneously * Contraindications to either modality

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total kg CO₂e per procedure for EUS vs MRCP.12 monthsTotal kg CO₂e per procedure for EUS vs MRCP.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emissions12 monthsEmissions per accurate diagnosis Emissions broken down by source (electricity, consumables, travel) Recommendations for sustainable diagnostic practices

Countries

India

Contacts

Primary ContactDr.Hardik Rughwani
dr.hardikr@aighospitals.com9426928600

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026