Choledocholithiasis
Conditions
Brief summary
MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures.
Detailed description
MRCP and EUS are diagnostically equivalent in detecting CBD stones among patients with intermediate risk, as shown in a landmark RCT. However, MRI-based imaging is power-intensive, requiring large infrastructure and long scan durations. EUS, a less energy-consuming and portable procedure, has the added advantage of enabling same-session ERCP, reducing the need for repeat procedures. Prior research confirms that diagnostic EUS generates significantly less CO₂e per procedure compared to radiologic imaging. This study aims to support sustainable diagnostic choices by quantifying their environmental footprint.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age ≥18 years * Intermediate likelihood of CBD stone (per ESGE) * Undergoing either MRCP or EUS for evaluation
Exclusion criteria
* High or low likelihood category (per ESGE) * Undergoing both MRCP and EUS simultaneously * Contraindications to either modality
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total kg CO₂e per procedure for EUS vs MRCP. | 12 months | Total kg CO₂e per procedure for EUS vs MRCP. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Emissions | 12 months | Emissions per accurate diagnosis Emissions broken down by source (electricity, consumables, travel) Recommendations for sustainable diagnostic practices |
Countries
India