Skip to content

Psychological Support Interventions for Women With Endometriosis (ENDOPSY)

Psychological Support Interventions and Their Effect on Quality of Life and Psychological Functioning in Women With Endometriosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial (ENDOPSY)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07280052
Acronym
ENDOPSY
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-12-12
Start date
2026-02-01
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Keywords

Endometriosis, Psychological Support, Psychotherapy, Quality of Life, Anxiety, Depression, Emotional Regulation, Women's Health

Brief summary

Endometriosis is associated with severe pain, impaired quality of life and significant psychological distress. Psychological support may help improve emotional regulation, mental health, and quality of life in affected women. This randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of three psychological support interventions-individual psychotherapy, socio-aesthetic group therapy, and a mixed approach combining both-on psychological symptoms and quality of life. Forty participants will be randomized into four parallel arms. The study hypothesis is that psychological support interventions improve psychological functioning and disease-related quality of life compared with no intervention, and that the combined mixed approach may produce greater benefits than the individual or group interventions alone.

Interventions

Ten individual psychotherapy sessions (45 minutes each) delivered every two weeks for 5 months by trained psychologists.

BEHAVIORALSocio-Aesthetic Group Therapy

Six socio-aesthetic therapy workshops (2 hours each) every two weeks over 3 months, focusing on body image, sensory experience, and emotional expression.

BEHAVIORALMixed Psychotherapy

Combined individual and group psychotherapy including alternating sessions and final integrative sessions matching the number and duration of individual and group interventions.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER
Université Lyon 2
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Four-arm parallel randomized study evaluating three psychological interventions versus control.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult women ≥18 years * Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis * Ability to understand and complete psychological evaluations * Signed written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Ongoing psychotherapy * Cognitive, sensory or language impairments preventing participation * Participation in another interventional clinical study * Persons under legal protection * Non-French speakers * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Endometriosis-Related Quality of Life (EHP-30 score)Baseline (T1) and 5 months (T2)Change in the EHP-30 total score between baseline and post-intervention. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Anxiety Symptoms (HADS-A score)Baseline and 5 monthsChange in anxiety symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) between baseline and T2. The HADS-A consists of 7 items scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.
Change in Depression Symptoms (HADS-D score)Baseline and 5 monthsChange in depressive symptoms measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D) between baseline and T2. The HADS-D consists of 7 items scored from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
Change in Alexithymia (TAS-20 score)Baseline and 5 monthsChange in alexithymia measured by the Toronto Alexithymia Scale - 20 items (TAS-20) between baseline and T2. The TAS-20 consists of 20 items scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 20 to 100. Higher scores indicate higher levels of alexithymia.
Change in Emotion Regulation (ERQ scores)Baseline and 5 monthsChange in emotion regulation measured by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression subscales between baseline and T2. The ERQ includes two subscales: Cognitive Reappraisal (6 items; score range 6 to 42) Expressive Suppression (4 items; score range 4 to 28) Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater use of the corresponding emotion regulation strategy.
Qualitative Themes Emerging From Semi-Structured InterviewsBaseline and 5 monthsQualitative analysis of thematic content from baseline and final interviews.

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTLecointe Mariane
mariane.lecointe@chu-lyon.fr04 78 86 66 53

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026