Comparison of RA-IVL and RA-SHP in Calcified Coronary Lesions

Vascular Calcification

Coronary Artery Disease, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Vascular calcification, Rotational atherectomy, Intravascular lithotripsy, Super high-pressure balloon, Major adverse cardiovascular events, Plaque modification

Study Design Prospective, multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial Hypothesis In patients with severely calcified coronary lesions undergoing rotational atherectomy (Rota), post-rotational lesion optimization using intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is non-inferior to super high-pressure balloon (SHPB) in terms of final minimal lumen diameter (MLD), with potential differences in acute lumen gain, stent expansion, and periprocedural complications. Inclusion Criteria * Age ≥ 18 years * De novo coronary lesions with severe calcification confirmed by angiography (moderate-to-severe calcification) and IVUS (calcification grade ≥2 by Mintz classification, or IVUS cannot pass) * Target vessel reference diameter 2.5-4.0 mm * Lesion length ≤ 30 mm suitable for rotational atherectomy * Clinical evidence of ischemia (stable or unstable angina, or functional ischemia testing) * Planned rotational atherectomy with residual calcification grade ≥2 post-Rota (burr ≤1.5 mm), or inadequate expansion with 2.5 mm non-compliant balloon at nominal pressure * Written informed consent provided Exclusion Criteria * Acute myocardial infarction within 7 days * Presence of thrombus, chronic total occlusion (CTO), or in-stent restenosis in target vessel * Lesion located in coronary artery bypass graft * Severe heart failure (LVEF \< 30%) * Previous stenting or rotational atherectomy in same target vessel * Known contrast allergy, active bleeding, severe comorbidity with life expectancy \< 12 months * Pregnancy or lactation * Participation in other interventional clinical trials Randomization After initial rotational atherectomy (burr ≤1.5 mm), eligible patients meeting imaging-defined need for further lesion optimization criteria will be randomized 1:1 to: Rota + IVL group: Intravascular lithotripsy using pulsed ultrasonic energy (up to 80 pulses, 8 cycles) followed by stent implantation Rota + SHPB group: Super high-pressure balloon (≥30 atm) expansion followed by stent implantation Stratification by: Study center, Reference vessel diameter (2.5-3.0 mm vs. \>3.0-4.0 mm) Primary Endpoint Post-procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD) measured by OCT/IVUS immediately after stent implantation and post-dilation Secondary Endpoints Procedural efficacy: Acute lumen gain, final stent expansion rate, minimal stent area, stent apposition Procedural safety: Periprocedural complications including coronary perforation, dissection, no-reflow/slow flow, acute stent thrombosis Clinical outcomes: MACE (composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months Other outcomes: Major bleeding (BARC ≥2), acute kidney injury (KDIGO criteria), procedure duration, contrast volume, radiation exposure Sample Size Total: 162 patients (81 per group) In-hospital monitoring until discharge Clinical follow-up at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months Imaging follow-up (OCT/IVUS) selectively at designated centers as per protocol or clinical indication Study Centers Three tertiary hospitals with extensive experience in complex coronary interventions and calcified lesion management: * Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University (coordinating center) * China-Japan Friendship Hospital * Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Study Duration January 2026 to December 2028 (3 years)

Severely calcified coronary lesions reduce vessel compliance, limit balloon expansion, and impair optimal stent deployment, leading to higher procedural risk. Rotational atherectomy (Rota) can modify superficial calcium but may be insufficient for deep or circumferential calcium. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and super high-pressure balloon angioplasty (SHPB) are both used for additional calcium modification, but direct comparative evidence in the post-Rota lesion optimization setting is limited. This multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind trial compares Rota + IVL versus Rota + SHPB for imaging-defined lesion optimization and periprocedural safety in severely calcified de novo coronary lesions, with clinical follow-up through 12 months. Study design and sites * Design: Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, single-blind trial; 1:1 allocation. * Sites: Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University (coordinating center); China-Japan Friendship Hospital; Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. * Study period: January 2026 to December 2028. * Sample size: 162 participants (81 per group). * Blinding: Operators are not blinded. Imaging analysts and/or (if applicable) endpoint adjudicators are blinded to treatment allocation. Core workflow (screening to final imaging) 1. Screening and baseline assessment * Collect clinical data, angiography, and planned OCT/IVUS when applicable. * Peri-procedural medications are administered per guideline-based and institutional practice and documented (antiplatelet therapy, intraprocedural anticoagulation, etc.). 2. Initial rotational atherectomy (all participants) * Rota is performed using a standardized approach across sites. * Maximum burr size: ≤1.5 mm. * Key procedural parameters are recorded (burr size, rotational speed, runs, and any complications and treatments). 3. Post-Rota randomization trigger assessment * OCT/IVUS and/or a protocol-defined balloon test is used to determine whether additional lesion optimization is needed (e.g., residual calcific constraint/inadequate compliance). * Eligible participants meeting trigger criteria are randomized 1:1 to IVL or SHPB. * Stratification factors: study site; reference vessel diameter (2.5-3.0 mm vs \>3.0-4.0 mm). 4. Randomized lesion optimization and stent implantation Rota + IVL arm * An appropriately sized IVL balloon is advanced across the lesion. * Lithotripsy is delivered per protocol limits (up to 80 pulses/8 cycles). * Repeat treatment and/or balloon resizing under imaging guidance is allowed and fully documented. Rota + SHPB arm * SHPB dilation is performed to modify the lesion. * Target pressure: ≥30 atm (pressure escalation steps, inflation duration, and maximum pressure per protocol; all parameters documented). * Repeat inflations and/or balloon exchange are allowed and documented. After randomized optimization, stent implantation and post-dilation are performed under imaging guidance. Devices and parameters are recorded (stent and post-dilation balloon sizes, pressures, number of inflations). 5. Immediate post-procedure imaging assessment (endpoint measurements) * OCT/IVUS is performed after stent implantation and final post-dilation. * Imaging pullbacks must cover the lesion and proximal/distal reference segments and meet minimum quality criteria. * Quantitative analysis follows prespecified definitions (e.g., post-procedural MLD, minimal stent area, stent expansion and apposition metrics). * Calcium morphology (arc, length, thickness, distribution) is captured for exploratory correlation and subgroup analyses. Safety monitoring and quality control * Periprocedural complications (e.g., perforation, dissection, slow-/no-reflow, acute stent thrombosis) are captured, graded, and reported using prespecified definitions and timelines. * Data are collected using standardized CRFs and a multicenter database for data capture, follow-up tracking, and quality assurance. * Monitoring focuses on: eligibility, randomization trigger criteria, key imaging timepoints, major safety events, and follow-up completeness. Follow-up * In-hospital monitoring until discharge. * Clinical follow-up at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months (clinic visit and/or telephone). * Collection of clinical events, bleeding and renal outcomes, and resource utilization metrics (procedure time, contrast volume, radiation exposure). * Imaging follow-up (if specified in the protocol or clinically indicated) may be performed selectively at designated centers. Statistical considerations (overview) * A noninferiority framework is used to compare the primary imaging outcome between groups. * Primary analysis population: intention-to-treat (ITT), with supportive per-protocol (PP) analysis. * Stratification factors are incorporated in the analysis model. Missing imaging data are handled using prespecified methods with sensitivity analyses.

No related papers found yet.

China