Skip to content

Dural Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural Analgesia in Labor

A Randomized Prospective Trial Comparing Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) and Standard Epidural Analgesia for Labor in Term Pregnant Women"

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07278895
Acronym
DPE-LABOR
Enrollment
102
Registered
2025-12-12
Start date
2026-01-20
Completion date
2026-04-06
Last updated
2026-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Analgesia, Epidural, Labor Pain, Pregnancy Related

Keywords

Dural Puncture Epidural, Standard Epidural Analgesia, Labor Analgesia

Brief summary

This randomized prospective study compares Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) and Standard Epidural Analgesia in term laboring women. The study evaluates analgesic quality, onset time, maternal and neonatal outcomes, side effects, and overall patient satisfaction.

Detailed description

This prospective randomized clinical trial is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) analgesia with Standard Epidural Analgesia in term laboring women requesting neuraxial analgesia. The DPE technique involves performing a dural puncture with a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle through the Tuohy epidural needle before catheter placement, without administering any intrathecal medication. In both groups, a bolus of 10 mL 0.125% bupivacaine with 1.5 µg/mL fentanyl is administered following a negative epidural test dose. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether DPE provides a faster onset and higher quality of labor analgesia compared with the conventional epidural technique. Secondary objectives include evaluating maternal hemodynamic changes, sensory and motor block characteristics, the need for additional bolus doses, total local anesthetic consumption, maternal side effects (hypotension, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention), post-dural puncture headache, fetal heart rate changes, Apgar scores, duration of labor, and overall patient satisfaction. Term pregnant women aged 18-45 years with cervical dilation ≥4 cm, effacement ≥50-60%, and baseline VAS ≥3 will be included. Exclusion criteria include hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placental abnormalities, contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia, morbid obesity (BMI ≥40), drug allergy, opioid dependence, or accidental dural puncture with the epidural needle. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the DPE group or the Standard Epidural group in a 1:1 ratio. All procedures will be performed at the Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital by anesthesiologists experienced in obstetric neuraxial techniques, and data will be collected by an independent observer not involved in the block procedure. The study aims to contribute to the growing body of evidence on optimizing labor analgesia techniques by determining whether the DPE approach leads to improved analgesic effectiveness, greater maternal comfort, and stable maternal-fetal outcomes compared with standard epidural analgesia.

Interventions

The Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) technique is performed by inserting a 27-gauge Whitacre spinal needle through the Tuohy epidural needle to puncture the dura without intrathecal drug injection. After removal of the spinal needle, an epidural catheter is placed, and following a negative test dose, a bolus of 10 mL 0.125% bupivacaine with 1.5 µg/mL fentanyl is administered.

Standard Epidural Analgesia is performed using a Tuohy needle without dural puncture. An epidural catheter is inserted into the epidural space, and after a negative test dose, a bolus of 10 mL 0.125% bupivacaine with 1.5 µg/mL fentanyl is administered.

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi Gazi Yasargil Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This is an open-label study. Due to the nature of the neuraxial procedures, the anesthesiologist performing the block cannot be blinded to the intervention. Participants and clinical staff are also aware of the assigned technique. No masking was applied.

Intervention model description

This study uses a two-arm parallel assignment model in which eligible laboring women are randomized equally to receive either Dural Puncture Epidural (DPE) analgesia or Standard Epidural Analgesia. Both groups are managed and observed concurrently without crossover between interventions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Term pregnant women (≥37 weeks of gestation). 2. Requesting neuraxial labor analgesia. 3. Age between 18 and 45 years. 4. ASA physical status I-II. 5. Cervical dilation ≥ 4 cm at the time of enrollment. 6. Cervical effacement ≥ 50-60%. 7. Baseline pain score of VAS ≥ 3. 8. Ability to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, eclampsia). 2. Placental abnormalities (placenta previa, placental abruption, etc.). 3. Contraindications to neuraxial anesthesia (coagulopathy, infection at puncture site, severe hypovolemia). 4. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids used in the study. 5. Morbid obesity (Body Mass Index ≥ 40 kg/m²). 6. Opioid dependence or chronic opioid use. 7. Accidental dural puncture with the epidural needle prior to randomization. 8. Multiple gestation or non-cephalic presentation (if clinically relevant to your protocol). 9. Fetal distress at the time of enrollment. 10. Patient refusal to participate. 11. Any condition deemed by the investigator to pose increased risk or interfere with study outcomes. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Onset of Effective Analgesia (VAS < 3)Within 30 minutes after epidural bolusTime in minutes from the administration of the initial epidural bolus until the patient reports a pain score of VAS \< 3, indicating effective labor analgesia.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensory Block LevelWithin 30 minutes after epidural bolusThe highest dermatome level of sensory block assessed by pinprick or cold test.
Motor Block Score (Bromage Score)Within 30 minutes after epidural bolusDegree of motor block measured using the Bromage scale (0-3).
Need for Additional Epidural BolusDuring labor until deliveryNumber of additional boluses required when VAS ≥ 4.
Time to First Additional BolusFrom initiation of analgesia to deliveryTotal amount (mL) of local anesthetic administered during labor.
Maternal Hemodynamic ChangesFirst 30 minutes after epidural bolusChanges in systolic/diastolic blood pressure and heart rate compared to baseline
Maternal Side EffectsDuring labor until deliveryIncidence of hypotension, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, or other complications.
Post-Dural Puncture Headache (PDPH)Day 3 and Day 7 postpartumPresence or absence of typical post-dural puncture headache symptoms.
Fetal Heart Rate ChangesDuring labor until deliveryAny abnormal fetal heart rate patterns following neuraxial analgesia.
Duration of LaborFrom initiation of analgesia to deliveryTime in minutes or hours from epidural bolus administration to birth.
Neonatal Apgar ScoresAt 1 minute and 5 minutes after birthNeonatal Apgar scores assessed at 1 and 5 minutes postpartum.
Maternal Satisfaction ScoreImmediately after deliveryPatient satisfaction with labor analgesia measured on a 0-10 Likert scale.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 8, 2026