Head and Neck Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Radiation-induced xerostomia, parotid gland dose, radiation dose, parotd sparing, MRI sialography
Brief summary
Radiation-induced xerostomia (dry mouth) is one of the most common and severe side effects for patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. New approaches are needed to reduce this side effect and improve patients' quality of life after treatment. This is a Phase II, single-center, double-masked, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial. It compares MRI-guided parotid ductal sparing to the standard approach of mean parotid gland sparing, focusing on patient-reported dry mouth outcomes in individuals receiving definitive radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.
Detailed description
Radiation-induced dry mouth (xerostomia) is the most commonly reported long-term side effect in patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. It occurs when saliva production decreases and the saliva becomes thicker. Patients with xerostomia often have trouble chewing, swallowing, and speaking, and are more likely to develop tooth decay. These problems can significantly lower a patient's quality of life-and the impact tends to get worse over time. The most common way to reduce radiation-related dry mouth is by limiting the average radiation dose to the parotid glands (which produce saliva). However, this is often not possible because of the patient's anatomy, and many patients still report moderate to severe symptoms long after treatment. To reduce side effects, some studies have tested giving a lower radiation dose (60Gy instead of the usual 70Gy) in patients with low-risk, HPV-associated tumors. While this has helped improve overall symptoms, xerostomia still remains the most severe and persistent problem reported by patients. New strategies are needed to better protect patients from radiation-related dry mouth and help maintain their quality of life after treatment. Recent research shows that the parotid gland does not respond evenly to radiation; certain areas, especially large salivary ducts where stem/progenitor cells live, may be key for recovery after damage. If these ducts can be located during treatment planning, the radiation dose to them could be reduced. A pilot study showed that using MRI sialography to identify the parotid ducts and plan radiation therapy around them is both possible and promising. Patients who received this type of duct-sparing RT had fewer moderate-to-severe dry mouth symptoms compared to patients treated with standard RT (46% vs. 71% at 6 months, and 36% vs. 50% at 12 months post-treatment). A larger, randomized study is still needed to confirm whether reducing radiation dose to the parotid ducts can meaningfully lower the risk of xerostomia and improve recovery after radiation treatment.
Interventions
DEVICEMRI sialography
Prior to radiation therapy treatment planning, all participants will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sialography in order to visualize patients' parotid ducts. This will enable these organs-at-risk to be spared during radiation treatment planning
OTHERParotid Duct Sparing Radiation Therapy Planning
Radiation therapy will be administered based on treatment planning that aims to minimize the dose to the parotid ducts.
OTHERParotid Sparing Radiation Therapy Planning
Radiation therapy will be administered based on treatment planning that uses the entire parotid gland volume as the organ-at-risk, in accordance with standard clinical practice. The parotid ducts will not be considered separately.
Sponsors
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)
Masking description
This study is double-masked, ensuring that both treating physicians and study participants are masked to treatment assignment.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
To participate in this study a subject must meet all of the eligibility criteria outlined below. Eligibility must be maintained for the subject to be considered eligible for ongoing trial participation. * Provide written informed consent to participate in the study and HIPAA authorization for release of personal health information. * Able to comply with study procedures based on the judgment of the clinical investigator. * Male or female, aged ≥ 18 years at the time of consent. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 at the time of consent. * Women of reproductive potential must use highly effective contraception. * T0-4, N0-3, M0 stage cancer of the oropharynx (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System 8th edition) planned for definitive radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. * No contraindications for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Exclusion criteria
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation In this study: * Patients with Sjogren's disease or baseline xerostomia. * Patients with lesions involving the salivary glands on diagnostic imaging * Patients with an allergy to lemon juice * Prior lifetime history of radiation therapy to the head and neck * Current pregnancy or lactation.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The rate of xerostomia score based on the University of Michigan Xerostomia -6 months Questionnaire - 6 months | 6 months | The rate of xerostomia score based on the University of Michigan Xerostomia Questionnaire (UMXQ) will be determined. UMXQ is an eight-item patient-reported instrument designed to assess the severity of xerostomia (dry mouth), gauging symptoms both during and outside of eating or chewing. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse xerostomia. Participants treated with parotid ductal sparing radiotherapy will be compared. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Salivary flow unstimulated | at 6 and 12 months | Participants will be asked not to eat, drink (except water), or smoke for at least one hour before the test and will rinse their mouth with deionized water five minutes prior to collection. Participants will sit comfortably with their head slightly forward and allow saliva to naturally accumulate in the mouth. They will spit into a pre-weighed cup every 60 seconds for five minutes. After a five-minute rest, stimulated saliva will be collected. Participants will chew paraffin gum for one minute at a controlled rate, then continue chewing and spit accumulated saliva into a separate pre-weighed cup every 60 seconds for five minutes. |
| Salivary flow stimulated | at 6 and 12 months | Stimulated saliva will be collected five-minute rest after the unstimulated saliva collection. Participants will chew paraffin gum for one minute at a controlled rate, then continue chewing and spit accumulated saliva into a separate pre-weighed cup every 60 seconds for five minutes. |
| The rate of xerostomia score based on the University of Michigan Xerostomia Questionnaire- 12 months | 12 months | The rate of xerostomia score based on the University of Michigan Xerostomia Questionnaire (UMXQ) will be determined. UMXQ is an eight-item patient-reported instrument designed to assess the severity of xerostomia (dry mouth), gauging symptoms both during and outside of eating or chewing. The score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse xerostomia. Participants treated with parotid ductal sparing radiotherapy will be compared. |
| The rate of xerostomia score based on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Head and Neck (MDASI - HN)- 12 months | 12 months | The rate of xerostomia will be assessed using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN), a validated patient-reported outcome measure evaluating symptom severity and impact on daily functioning in head and neck cancer patients. It includes 13 core symptom items (e.g., fatigue, pain, nausea), 9 head and neck-specific items (e.g., swallowing difficulty, dry mouth, taste changes, voice problems), and 6 interference items assessing effects on mood, work, and enjoyment of life. Each item is rated on a 0-10 scale, where 0 indicates no symptom or interference and 10 indicates the worst severity or complete interference. Scores are calculated as the mean of core symptom items for total severity, the mean of head and neck-specific items, and the mean of interference items. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
CONTACTTuvara King
CONTACTMelissa Knutsen
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDavid Fried, PhD
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Outcome results
None listed